Skip to content

· Private foundation

Juedes Molinaro Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$180kEducation$134kHealth$89kHuman Services$52kRecreation & Sports$39kPhilanthropy$26kFood & Nutrition$13kAnimals$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $175k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$315k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIV OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE$175,000
UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI$25,000
WINMAN$20,000
HUMANE SOCIETY MARATHON COUNTY$10,000
WOMENS COMMUNITY$5,000
HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION$3,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION$1,000
ASPIRUS HEALTH CAREHOWARD YOUNG$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
COVENANT HOUSE ST JUDE$1,000
HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK ST MATHEW$1,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$1
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 10%HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK: $1k → 11%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTAIN ATHELETES: $1k → 15%UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $25k → 10%UNIV OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE: $175k → 11%HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%WINMAN: $20k → 10%HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK ST MATHEW: $1k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $25k → 10%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%CAMPMANITOWISHJORNWINMAN: $17k → 12%ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK ST MATHEW: $1k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $25k → 10%UNIV OF WISCONSIN: $15k → 11%CAMPMANITOWISHJORNWINMAN: $10k → 12%HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK ST MATHEW: $1k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $20k → 10%SALVATION ARMY: $15k → 11%CAMPMANITOWISHJORNWINMAN: $5k → 12%UNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $15k → 10%HUMANE SOCIETY MARATHON COUNTY: $10k → 11%ASPIRUS HEALTH CARE: $9k → 11%WOMENS COMMUNITY: $7k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN: $7k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $6k → 11%ST ANNES ST MICHAELS LACROSSE DI: $5k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE: $5k → 11%WOMENS COMMUNITY: $5k → 11%WOMENS COMMUNITY: $5k → 11%WOMENS COMMUNITY: $5k → 11%ASPIRUS HEALTH CAREHOWARD YOUNG: $4k → 11%ASPIRUS HEALTH CAREHOWARD YOUNG: $3k → 11%ASPIRUS HEALTH CAREHOWARD YOUNG: $2k → 11%UNIV OF WISCONSIN: $2k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMRNT: $1k → 11%MARATHON CTY HUMANE SOCIE: $1k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMRNT: $1k → 11%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMRNT: $1k → 11%ASPIRUS HEALTH CAREHOWARD YOUNG: $1k → 11%VICTIM'S FUND: $8k → 11%NEIGHBORS PLACE: $7k → 11%PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATIO: $5k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 11%PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATIO: $3k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$561k · 27 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$561k
$1k

Still filing today

22%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $64k · revenue +141%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S COMMUNITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +33%
  • PA
    PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +493%

Funded once

  • HC
    HARRY CHAPPIN FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women and Children's Horizons Inc

The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.

Human Services
2
Woman's Club of Wisconsin Foundation Inc

To support philanthropic, educational, and cultural programs and to ensure, through our expanding endowment, that the woman's club of wisconsin's historic commitment to community service endures and flourishes.

—
3
Healthy Wisconsin Alliance Inc

Healthy wisconsin alliance, inc. was created to promote the social welfare of the citizens of wisconsin including developing, defining, and encouraging distribution of information about wisconsin's health care climate and the importance of…

—
4
Wisconsin Humane Society

The mission of the Wisconsin Humane Society is to make a difference for animals and the people who love them.

Animals
5
Woman's Club of Wisconsin

The woman's club of wisconsin cultivates educational, cultural, philanthropic, and social exchange to inspire engagement in the community.

—
6
Wisconsin Public Health Association Inc

Our mission is to build collective action to address root-causes and advance public health policy & practice to achieve a vision for a healthier, safer, and more equitable wisconsin.

—
7
Women's Resource Center of Racine Inc

The women's resource center (wrc), is a not for profit agency dedicated to providing crisis intervention services to women and children who are victims of domestic abuse and sexual assault, thus promoting positive changes in the community…

Human Services
8
Ywca of Madison Foundation Inc

None

Youth Development
9
White County Domestic Violence Prevention Inc

Prevention of domestic violence and protection and assistance to women and children who are victims of abuse.

Human Services
10
Ywca Allentown

To eliminate racism, empower women, and promote peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
11
Humane Animal Welfare Society of Waukesha County Inc

The humane animal welfare society of waukesha county leads the community in animal welfare and assures sanctuary for animals in need.

Animals
12
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors Place Inc the; the most unlike its peers is Little Warrior Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIV OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE: $180,100 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIREUNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETI: $110,001 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN ATHLETICAMPMANITOWISHJORNWINMAN: $32,002 · OtherCAMPMANITOWISHJORNWINMANNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,110 · OtherUNIV OF WISCONSIN: $23,500 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S COMMUNITY INC: $22,510 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $21,610 · OtherWINMAN: $20,000 · Other+20 more: $67,183 · Other+20 moreLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $63,601 · PhilanthropyLITTLE WARRI…HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropySave The Children Federation Inc: $10,001 · InternationalHUMANE SOCIETY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $8,601 · Arts & Culture
Other$502,016Philanthropy$66,601International$10,001Animals$10,000Arts & Culture$8,601

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $63,601 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S COMMUNITY INC: $22,510 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE: $8,701 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC: $8,601 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSON YMCA INC: $502 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS PLACE INC THE ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON YMCA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin IncWI19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Central Wisconsin Inc · Incrediblebank Foundation Inc · Lewitzke Foundation Inc · Bell Family Charitable Foundation I · The Macdonald Foundation · Judd S Alexander Foundation · Ba & Esther Greenheck Foundation · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Juedes Molinaro Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Juedes Molinaro Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Juedes Molinaro Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph