Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Michigan · Private foundation

Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
10%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 12
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$935k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 10% of the organizations Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$31k13%
FY202410$44k10%
FY202312$46k17%
FY202211$123k36%
FY202112$75k33%
FY20209$49k11%
FY201910$41kn/a
85% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$145kPhilanthropy$139kHealth$38kCivil Rights$35kCommunity Improvement$25kPublic Benefit$15kFood & Nutrition$13kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Anti-Defamation League$35,00030%
Find Ventures Co$25,00013%
Yad Ezra$13,40050%
Temple Israel of Detroit$9,6003n/a
Craig Hospital Foundation$9,50070%
Hospice of Michigan Inc$7,00060%
Henry Ford Health System$1,50010%
Detroit Dance Collective$1,45041%
South Oakland Shelter$50010%
Gesher Human Services$50010%

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($307k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnti-Defamation League: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFind Ventures Co: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetYad Ezra: $13,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCraig Hospital Foundation: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHenry Ford Health System: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Dance Collective: $1,450 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSouth Oakland Shelter: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGesher Human Services: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation with peer funders

About Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation

How much does Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation give?
Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $31,400 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 12 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (30%), Philanthropy (29%), Health (8%).
Who are Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Anti-Defamation League ($35k), Find Ventures Co ($25k), Yad Ezra ($13k).
Does Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 10% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation based?
Judith and Bradley Schram Family Foundation is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Judith and Bradley Schram Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home