Skip to content

· Private foundation

Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett Trust Inc

Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$26k
Granted FY2017
28
Grants FY2017
16
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
16
States reached
$28k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT FRANCIS CHURCH$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$4,300
LAMBDA NORTH AA TREATMENT$3,000
BREAD OF LIFE$2,000
MID TENNESSEE ASSOC OF ALCOHOL &$2,000
SISTERS WITH PURPOSE$1,000
CONNECT US OUTREACH MINISTRY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KARIDAT SOCIAL SVC$750
MORRISTOWN-HAMBLEM CENTRAL$550
FEEDING MINISTRY OF CHRIST$500
CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY$500
KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$500
EMMAUS HOUSE$500
CHRISTIAN CARE$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EMMAUS HOUSE: $500 → 13%SISTERS WITH PURPOSE: $1k → 20%COLLIER HARVEST FOUNDATION: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
WY
IN
PA
NJ
MO
KY
MD
KS
TN
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christs Kitchen & Food Pantry Inc

To provide food for the impoverished and hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
3
Potters House Ministries Inc

Provide funds for food, utilities and housing for area residents in emergency situations. Also provide food distributions to needy individuals. Also provide income tax preparation services for individuals and families in need. Also…

Human Services
4
Peoples Pantry At Church Road

Provide food & other items to families in the area who cannot afford to purchase these items.

Food & Nutrition
5
Christian Love Pantry Inc

To provide food for those in need

Food & Nutrition
6
Hempfield Area Food Pantry Inc

Provide hunger relief to individuals and families who are unable to afford food and receive inadequate government financial assistance

Food & Nutrition
7
Crisis Breadbasket

Provide food to families in need within the local area.

—
8
Fathers Heart Street Ministry

Feed the Homeless and Low Income Individuals and help in domestic violence situations.

Human Services
9
Christian Ministries of H'burg Inc

Provision of food, clothing & shelter.

Human Services
10
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
11
Caring Kitchen Inc

Charitable Organization organized to provide food and shelter to the homeless and needy.

—
12
Camden Area Christian Food Pantry

Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Christian Food Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marianas Racing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT FRANCIS CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS CHURCHST VINCENT DE PAUL: $4,300 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULLAMBDA NORTH AA TREATMENT: $3,000 · OtherLAMBDA NORTH AA TREATMENTMID TENNESSEE ASSOC OF ALCOHOL &: $2,000 · OtherMID TENNESSEE ASSOC OF ALCOHOL &BREAD OF LIFE INC: $2,000 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherCONNECT US OUTREACH MINISTRY: $1,000 · Other+15 more: $4,300 · Other+15 moreSISTERS WITH PURPOSE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEMMAUS HOUSE INC: $500 · Human ServicesCOLLIER HARVEST FOUNDATION: $200 · Human ServicesMarianas Racing Association: $750 · Recreation & SportsCHRISTIAN CARE: $500 · Housing & ShelterKNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Religion
Other$22,600Human Services$1,700Recreation & Sports$750Housing & Shelter$500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSISTERS WITH PURPOSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMAUS HOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetA CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOLLIER HARVEST FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAITHERSBURG HELP INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SISTERS WITH PURPOSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Marianas Racing Association ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CARE ↗
  • Who funds KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds A CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER HARVEST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GAITHERSBURG HELP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett Trust Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett Trust Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph