· Private foundation
Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett Trust Inc
Its FY2017 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAINT FRANCIS CHURCH | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $4,300 |
| LAMBDA NORTH AA TREATMENT | $3,000 |
| BREAD OF LIFE | $2,000 |
| MID TENNESSEE ASSOC OF ALCOHOL & | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| CONNECT US OUTREACH MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| SISTERS WITH PURPOSE | $1,000 |
| KARIDAT SOCIAL SVC | $750 |
| MORRISTOWN-HAMBLEM CENTRAL | $550 |
| EMMAUS HOUSE | $500 |
| KNOXVILLE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $500 |
| FEEDING MINISTRY OF CHRIST | $500 |
| CHRISTIAN FOOD PANTRY | $500 |
| CHRISTIAN CARE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide food for the impoverished and hungry.
Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.
Provide funds for food, utilities and housing for area residents in emergency situations. Also provide food distributions to needy individuals. Also provide income tax preparation services for individuals and families in need. Also…
Provide food & other items to families in the area who cannot afford to purchase these items.
To provide food for those in need
Provide hunger relief to individuals and families who are unable to afford food and receive inadequate government financial assistance
Provide food to families in need within the local area.
Feed the Homeless and Low Income Individuals and help in domestic violence situations.
Provision of food, clothing & shelter.
Religious Orginazation
Charitable Organization organized to provide food and shelter to the homeless and needy.
Provide food and basic necessities to individuals and families in need in the Camden, Maine area
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Christian Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marianas Racing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Juanita Bateman & Betty Barrett Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.