Skip to content
JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
91
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$8.4MReligion$6.3MFood & Nutrition$6.1MEducation$5.9MArts & Culture$3.3MInternational$3.2MHealth$2.7MEnvironment$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 91 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $688k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.2M
$10,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE$2,500,000
MAKE THE CONNECTION$750,000
SUNRISE COMMUNITY CHURCH$450,000
EMPOWER MALI$385,000
OCEAN LAB INC$300,000
PATRIOTS HALL OF DRIPPING SPRINGS INC$300,000
BEREA COLLEGE$300,000
CAPTAIN PAUL WATSON FOUNDATION$250,000
SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC$208,000
AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS$165,000
AUSTIN-TRAVIS COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETA$161,373
CONNECTHER$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$100,000
WE CARE RESCUE RANCH INC$100,000
ANDREW GOMEZ DREAM FOUNDATION$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIRACLE MESSAGES: $25k → 10%BROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL: $75k → 6%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $329k → 11%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 13%BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 9%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 11%BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $100k → 9%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 17%PVBLIC FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 14%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 11%BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $40k → 9%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $148k → 17%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $250k → 11%BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $34k → 9%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $25k → 17%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $208k → 11%BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 9%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 11%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 14%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%THE DALMATIAN DREAMS FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 10%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL MISSION TEAM INC: $35k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL MISSION TEAM INC: $25k → 14%THE DREAM CATCHER FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES MEDICAL MISSION TEAM INC: $25k → 14%SAVING INNOCENCE INC: $100k → 14%BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ: $20k → 14%OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC: $350k → 10%OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 10%OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 10%OTHER ONES FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 10%SIMA STUDIOS: $25k → 14%SIMA STUDIOS: $25k → 14%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $69k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $26k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $26k → 10%THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $25k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $16k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 10%LIGHTER LOADS ATX: $40k → 10%LIGHTER LOADS ATX: $20k → 10%MULTICULTURAL REFUGEE COALITION: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45M · 109 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

109 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
147

Total granted

$45M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+15%

Still filing today

81%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $5.5M · revenue +320%
  • AT
    AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +155%
  • BEREA COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • MI
    MANITOU INSTITUTE AND CONSERVANCYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $613k · revenue ×47
  • TG
    TRANSFIGURATION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • RC
    REDFORD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
2
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
3
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
4
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
6
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
7
Austin Area Foundation

Support nonprofit organizations by managing & distributing charitable gifts

Philanthropy
8
Ufw Foundation

The ufw foundation's mission is to empower communities to ensure human dignity.

—
9
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
10
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
11
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
12
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Hills Works Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

234 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 234 of the 288 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
223/234
Grantees still filing
142/234
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF BIOCENTRISM INC: $4,145,875 · OtherCHURCH OF BIOCENTRISM INCTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $2,653,645 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCETHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $2,407,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTINFOUNDATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRO: $1,285,000 · OtherPRESIDENT OF SONRISE MINISTRIES: $1,000,000 · Other+127 more: $14,034,286 · Other+127 moreAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $4,876,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEAT…+17 more: $899,355 · Arts & Culture+17 moreMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,539,545 · ReligionMOBILE LOAVE…BEREA COLLEGE: $3,050,000 · EducationBEREA COLL…MAKE THE CONNECTION: $750,000 · EducationMAKE THE C…THE ANDREW GOMEZ DREAM FOUNDATION: $277,000 · EducationTHE ANDREW…+15 more: $606,557 · Education+15 moreSELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,487,771 · Human ServicesSELFLESS …THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $888,000 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER…BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $399,000 · Human ServicesBOUNTIFUL…YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $397,600 · Human ServicesYOUTH VIL…THE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $202,030 · Human Services+14 more: $814,000 · Human Services+14 moreEmpower Mali: $2,446,090 · InternationalTHE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC: $100,000 · International+6 more: $133,824 · InternationalPATRIOTS' HALL OF DRIPPING SPRINGS: $1,974,244 · Public BenefitWISH FOR OUR HEROES INC: $225,000 · Public BenefitX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $115,000 · Public Benefit
Other$25,525,806Arts & Culture$5,775,355Religion$5,539,545Education$4,683,557Human Services$4,188,401International$2,679,914Public Benefit$2,434,244

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,539,545 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $4,876,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $3,050,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $2,653,645 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetEmpower Mali: $2,446,090 over 8y, 61% of budgetPATRIOTS' HALL OF DRIPPING SPRINGS: $1,974,244 over 4y, 39% of budgetSELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,487,771 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetTHE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $888,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetCONNECTHER: $732,536 over 7y, 46% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $575,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $442,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetBOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT: $399,000 over 4y, 43% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $397,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC: $350,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetThe 100 Club of Central Texas: $340,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER: $335,866 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEastwood Ranch Foundation: $317,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER INC: $300,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetChampions Off the Field: $290,500 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetTHE ANDREW GOMEZ DREAM FOUNDATION: $277,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetTHE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS: $265,500 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetKEEP AUSTIN FED: $263,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetWe Care Rescue Ranch Inc: $250,000 over 2y, 99% of budgetPREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $250,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetWISH FOR OUR HEROES INC: $225,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $206,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION: $203,950 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetTHE REFUGEE COLLECTIVE: $202,030 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetEl Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission: $200,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFOODCHAIN INC: $150,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetHungry Hill Foundation: $135,429 over 3y, 13% of budgetEASTSIDE KINGS FOUNDATION: $132,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $128,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDALMATIAN DREAMS DBA DREAM FOUNDATION: $124,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetMotorcycle Missions: $121,596 over 3y, 24% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJUST COMMUNITY INC: $120,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetWe Can Now Inc: $117,567 over 3y, 25% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC: $115,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $110,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBABY2BABY: $110,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCCFF - CRYSTAL CLEAR FILM FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC IMPACT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK FOR AID RELIEF AND ASSISTANCE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetMUHAMMAD ALI MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Empower Mali ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOTS' HALL OF DRIPPING SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE THE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTHER ↗
  • Who funds MANITOU INSTITUTE AND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BOUNTIFUL AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC DBA AMERICAN MOBILITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The 100 Club of Central Texas ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Eastwood Ranch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Champions Off the Field ↗
  • Who funds THE ANDREW GOMEZ DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BRENT SHAPIRO FOUNDATION FOR DRUG AWARENESS ↗
  • Who funds KEEP AUSTIN FED ↗
  • Who funds We Care Rescue Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAPTAIN PAUL WATSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WISH FOR OUR HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
  • Who funds VINCARE SERVICES OF AUSTIN FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foun…St David's FoundationA Glimmer of Hope Fou…Better Business BureauUnited Way for Greate…The Applied Materials…Shield-Ayres Foundati…Greater Austin Perfor…The Moody FoundationTopfer Family Foundat…The Cynthia & George …Alice Kleberg Reynold…
Austin Community Foundation IncTX57.4× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · St David's Foundation · A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin · Better Business Bureau · United Way for Greater Austin · The Applied Materials Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc · The Moody Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Farm Aid Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Chrysalis Center Inc: 93% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation?

Find your warmest path to JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 288 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on JP's Peace Love & Happiness’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home