Skip to content

· Private foundation

JP Humphreys Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$7.0MSocial Science$2.5MCivil Rights$2.1MEducation$1.5MScience & Tech$750kPublic Benefit$750kCommunity Improvement$600kArts & Culture$580kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Donor's Trust$500,000
Foundation For Economic Education$160,000
Moving Picture Institute$150,000
Atlas Network$100,000
State Policy Network$100,000
Mercatus Center$100,000
The Federalist Society$100,000
Competitive Enterprise Institute$100,000
Mackinac Center for Public Policy$75,000
Kansas Policy Institute$50,000
Certell Inc$50,000
American Institute for Economic Research$50,000
Hillsdale College$50,000
Center for Independent Thought$50,000
Free to Choose Network$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Joplin Family Y: $250 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.0M · 30 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$9.0M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+20%

Still filing today

73%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitEducationSocial ScienceCivil RightsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Economic Education Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +38%
  • CE
    COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $600k · revenue +81%
  • MC
    Mercatus Center Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $560k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1.1M · revenue +266%
  • NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -41%
  • JR
    JOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2019 · $125k · revenue -65%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
Frontiers of Freedom Institute

To educate the public on constitutional issues and public policy matters. We are dedicated to the principles of individual liberty, peace through strength, limited government, free enterprise, and the values embodied in the Declaration of…

Public Benefit
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
The Libertarian Institute

Disseminate information and education about pertinent economic, social and governmental topics, via print, web and other media to educate the public about the principles of LIbertarianism.

Education
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies Inc

To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.

Education
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
Independence Institute

The mission of independence institute is to empower individuals and to educate citizens,legislators and opinion makers about public policies that enhance personal and economic freedom.

Public Benefit
9
Contemporary Policy Institute
Philanthropy
10
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
11
The Lincoln Institute of Public Opinion Research Inc

To promote the ideals of free market economics, individual liberty, and limited government through the conduct of public opinion research.

Social Science
12
Freedom Forum Institute Inc

The mission of the freedom forum institute is to champion the five freedoms of the first amendment through education and entertainment.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies; the most unlike its peers is Joplin Regional Medical School Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/34
Grantees still filing
23/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Donors Trust Inc: $6,750,000 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust Inc+2 more: $285,000 · PhilanthropyCATO: $1,250,000 · OtherCATOAtlas Network: $600,000 · OtherAtlas NetworkCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $600,000 · OtherCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INST…Individual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $300,000 · OtherTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR …THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $201,000 · OtherCERTELL INC: $270,000 · OtherCERTELL INCNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Other+16 more: $386,500 · Other+16 moreFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $1,484,500 · Social ScienceFoundation for …Mercatus Center Inc: $560,000 · Social ScienceMercatus Center…CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $250,000 · Social ScienceCENTER FOR INDE…AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $176,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN INSTIT…FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $1,150,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION…STATE POLICY NETWORK: $450,000 · Civil RightsSTATE POLI…THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Civil RightsTHE FUTURE…+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsKANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE: $350,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $175,000 · EducationJOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $125,000 · EducationEmergent Order Foundation Inc: $45,000 · Education+1 more: $25,000 · EducationMACKINAC CENTER: $450,000 · Public BenefitVIRGINIA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $200,000 · Public BenefitLibertas Network: $140,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $30,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $25,000 · Public BenefitFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $300,000 · Arts & CultureMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $150,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$7,035,000Other$4,257,500Social Science$2,470,500Civil Rights$1,711,000Education$1,020,000Public Benefit$845,000Arts & Culture$450,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDonors Trust Inc: $6,750,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFoundation for Economic Education Inc: $1,484,500 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $1,150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $600,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetMercatus Center Inc: $560,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $450,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMACKINAC CENTER: $450,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetKANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE: $350,000 over 6y, 5.9% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $300,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetTHE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCERTELL INC: $270,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $250,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $225,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $201,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetVIRGINIA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $200,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH: $176,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $175,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $150,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLibertas Network: $140,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE: $125,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTHE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF UFM INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAmerica's Future Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEmergent Order Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Voices: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Economic Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Mercatus Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MACKINAC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CERTELL INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Libertas Network ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN REGIONAL MEDICAL SCHOOL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE FUTURE OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UFM INC ↗
  • Who funds America's Future Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Emergent Order Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Young Voices ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA33.5× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Charles Koch Foundation · Atlas Economic Research Foundation · The Armstrong Foundation · Garvey Kansas Foundation · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Institute · Triad Foundation Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Dunn Foundation · Bartley J Madden Foundation · Pierre F & Enid Goodrich Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JP Humphreys Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JP Humphreys Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to JP Humphreys Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to JP Humphreys Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on JP Humphreys’ filings →

    More from the funding graph