Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jp Brinker-Uys Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$127kRecreation & Sports$48kReligion$21kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$11kHealth$450Animals$200
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC$20,000
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION$5,100
INTERNATIONAL CHARTER ACADEMY OF GA$5,000
ACTORS EXPRESS$5,000
US ROWING$5,000
US WATER POLO$5,000
HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH$4,650
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $2k → 22%US WATER POLO: $5k → 10%SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS: $2k → 17%MARIETTA COBB MUSEUM OF ART: $5k → 8%INTERNATIONAL CHARTER ACADEMY OF GA: $5k → 9%ART SANDY SPRINGS: $1k → 13%EMORY CREW ROWING FUND: $5k → 14%ST IGNATIOUS CHICAGO ROWING: $600 → 14%US ROWING: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1k → 22%US WATER POLO INC: $1k → 10%AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $200 → 8%ACTORS EXPRESS: $5k → 13%ATLANTA HUMANE SOCIETY: $200 → 13%THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 13%THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%GA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%GA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $6k → 13%THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 13%THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 13%TRANSFORMING TOMORROW THE CAMPAIGN FOR GEORGIA TECH: $15k → 13%GA TECH MEN'S WATER POLO CLUB: $10k → 13%GA TECH ROWING CLUB: $5k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $5k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $5k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $4k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $4k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $2k → 13%HOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$161k · 6 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$161k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $95k · revenue +45%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +29%
  • UW
    USA WATER POLO INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TT
    TRANSFORMING TOMORROW THE CAMPAIGN FOR GEORGIA TECH
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • GT
    GA TECH MEN'S WATER POLO CLUB
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MC
    MARIETTA COBB MUSEUM OF ART INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Founded in 1780, the american academy of arts and sciences honors excellence and convenes leaders from every field of human endeavor to examine new ideas, address issues of importance to the nation and the world, and work together "to…

Social Science
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
5
Usa Artistic Swimming

Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…

—
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
8
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
American Political Science Association

The american political science association ("apsa") supports excellence in scholarship and teaching and informed discourse about politics, policy, and civic participation. the association promotes a lively, diverse community of scholars,…

Social Science
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Actors Express Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · EducationGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INCWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $22,300 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $5,100 · EducationHOLY INNOCENTS CHURCH: $20,850 · OtherHOLY INNOCENTS CHURCHGA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $16,000 · OtherGA TECH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONTRANSFORMING TOMORROW THE CAMPAIGN FOR GEORGIA TECH: $15,000 · OtherTRANSFORMING TOMORROW THE CAMPAIGN FOR GE…GA TECH MEN'S WATER POLO CLUB: $10,000 · OtherGA TECH MEN'S WATER POLO CLUBGA TECH ROWING CLUB: $5,000 · OtherGA TECH ROWING CLUBEMORY CREW ROWING FUND: $5,000 · OtherEMORY CREW ROWING FUNDUNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherUNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATIONINTERNATIONAL CHARTER ACADEMY OF GA: $5,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CHARTER ACADEMY OF GA+1 more: $600 · OtherActors Express Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMARIETTA COBB MUSEUM OF ART INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureART SANDY SPRINGS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUSA WATER POLO INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $450 · HealthAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $200 · Animals
Education$122,400Other$82,450Arts & Culture$11,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Health$450Animals$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $22,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUSA WATER POLO INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIETTA COBB MUSEUM OF ART INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $3,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetART SANDY SPRINGS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jp Brinker-Uys Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jp Brinker-Uys Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jp Brinker-Uys’ filings →

    More from the funding graph