Skip to content
Joyce and Tony Singh Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Joyce and Tony Singh Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$141kArts & Culture$117kEnvironment$111kHuman Services$34kPhilanthropy$28kCivil Rights$18kPublic Benefit$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Nahant Marsh Education Center$21,710
SAL Foundation$10,000
Center for Active Seniors$8,440
UUCQC$6,000
WVIK$5,300
Islamic Center of the Quad Cities$5,000
Don Bosco Centers$5,000
AAUW$5,000
UMANO$5,000
Dennos Museum$3,500
Driftless Water Defenders$3,110
River Action$2,000
Thich Nhat Hanh Foundation$2,000
Salvation Army$1,000
TCQC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Don Bosco Centers: $5k → 15%World Food Program: $515 → 14%QCAIR: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
CA
MO
MD
AZ
DC
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$417k · 25 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
59

Total granted

$417k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+7%

Still filing today

40%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER
    7× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +404%
  • FA
    FIGGE ART MUSEUM
    7× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +39%
  • RA
    RIVER ACTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • PR
    PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +75%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • TA
    TMBC at the Lincoln Resource Center
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce

The quad cities chamber of commerce is a combined chamber of commerce, economic, and community development organization serving the greater quad cities region. the quad cities chamber of commerce's mission is to strengthen and enhance the…

Community Improvement
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
5
Twin Cities Diversity in Practice

To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.

Community Improvement
6
Intertribal Agriculture Council

The intertribal agriculture council was founded in 1987 to pursue and promote the conservation, development and use of our agricultural resources of american indian and alaska native tribes.

—
7
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
8
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
9
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
10
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
11
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. qi's staff and non-resident experts expose the costs and consequences of…

Community Improvement
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quad Cities Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Piper Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
23/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UUCQC: $97,170 · OtherUUCQCIndividual grant recipient: $49,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRIVER ACTION INC: $27,638 · OtherRIVER ACTION INCPolyrhythm: $25,550 · OtherPolyrhythmWVIK: $22,800 · OtherJewish Federation of the Quad Cities: $18,600 · Other+72 more: $203,612 · Other+72 moreNAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER: $60,027 · EnvironmentNAHANT MARSH …PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $10,000 · EnvironmentPRAIRIE RIVER…Driftless Water Defenders: $3,110 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentFIGGE ART MUSEUM: $33,756 · Arts & CultureBALLET QUAD CITIES: $5,000 · Arts & CultureQUAD CITY ARTS INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $610 · Arts & CultureAUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $5,000 · EducationSPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $2,500 · EducationST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $500 · EducationNEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER: $8,600 · Food & NutritionAKHUWAT USA: $3,806 · PhilanthropyQUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PIPER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $5,000 · Human ServicesQCAIR INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $515 · Human Services
Other$445,120Environment$73,637Arts & Culture$41,866Education$13,000Food & Nutrition$8,600Philanthropy$7,806Human Services$6,515

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER: $60,027 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetFIGGE ART MUSEUM: $33,756 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRIVER ACTION INC: $27,638 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetJewish Federation of the Quad Cities: $18,600 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER: $8,600 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $8,475 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Active Seniors Inc: $8,440 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT PLAINS ACTION SOCIETY: $5,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTHHOPE: $5,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBALLET QUAD CITIES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKHUWAT USA: $3,806 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVENPORT BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION KIM CANG TEMPLE: $3,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDriftless Water Defenders: $3,110 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetQUAD CITY ARTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetQUAD CITIES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC CIRCLE OF NORTH AMERIC DBA RISING STARS ISLAMIC SCHOOL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONARCH RESEARCH PROJECT: $1,130 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetQCAIR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetQUAD CITIES GOLF CLASSIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAJO NATION BAR ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMON CHORD: $610 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PIPER FAMILY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST AMBROSE UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KING'S HARVEST INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAVENPORT SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIGGE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds RIVER ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of the Quad Cities ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NEST NOURISH EVERYONE SUSTAINABLY TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Active Seniors Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS ACTION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHHOPE ↗
  • Who funds BALLET QUAD CITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AKHUWAT USA ↗
  • Who funds DAVENPORT BUDDHIST ASSOCIATION KIM CANG TEMPLE ↗
  • Who funds Driftless Water Defenders ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Quad Cities Community…Scott County Regional…Quad Cities Golf Clas…Doris & Victor Day Fo…The Rock Island Commu…Rauch Family Foundati…Grant & Virginia Bris…Harold R Bechtel Char…Modern Woodmen of Ame…Hubbell-Waterman FndnMoline FoundationAmerican Water Charit…
Quad Cities Community FoundationIA35.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Quad Cities Community Foundation · Scott County Regional Authority · Quad Cities Golf Classic Charitable Foundation · Doris & Victor Day Foundation Inc · The Rock Island Community Foundation · Rauch Family Foundation I Inc · Grant & Virginia Brissman Foundation Nfp · Harold R Bechtel Charitable Trust · Modern Woodmen of America · Hubbell-Waterman Fndn · Moline Foundation · American Water Charitable Foundationinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joyce and Tony Singh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joyce and Tony Singh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joyce and Tony Singh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home