Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joy & Thomas Kealey Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Education$42kArts & Culture$10kHousing & Shelter$5kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$3kYouth Development$2kAnimals$2kCommunity Improvement$2kHealth$800Other$27k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$462k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$24,475
ST LUKES FOUNDATION$5,000
SUN VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Womens and Childrens Alliance: $2k → 8%Womens and Childrens Alliance: $1k → 8%CATCH: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
16

Total granted

$90k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+17%

Still filing today

62%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +96%
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +14%
  • IS
    IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -36%
  • UO
    University of Idaho Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +7%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Law Foundation Inc

The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…

2
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
3
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
4
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
5
Boise Metro Chamber of Commerce Inc

The boise metro chamber of commerce is the principal advocate for the business community dedicated to building prosperity in the region.

6
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

7
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

8
Icon Credit Union

Our promise is to deliver an experience of financial success, with unique style, at every stage of your life.

9
Idaho Technology Council Foundation

The corporation advances charitable and educational initiatives as an affiliate of the Idaho Technology Council. It promotes digiatl literacy technology education and workforce readiness across Idaho by funding and delivering…

Science & Tech
10
Nami Idaho

Nami idaho works to improve the quality of life for all those affected by mental illness through support, education, advocacy and research.

Human Services
11
Bonner General Hospital Foundation Inc

The Bonner General Health Foundation is committed to advancing the promise to change and save lives through philanthropy by developing resources and creating awareness that helps expand the trust the community has in Bonner General Health.

Health
12
Idaho Falls Symphony Society Inc

To provide quality life orchestral experiences of the world's greatest music for the enjoyment, enrichment and education of our audiences and musicians.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Idaho Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Boys & Girls Clubs of Canyon County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Boise State University Foundation Inc — $41,725 · EducationBoise State University Foundation Inc+2 more — $750 · EducationST LUKES FOUNDATION — $14,000 · OtherST LUKES FOUNDATIONBoise State Athletic Association — $7,000 · OtherBoise State Athletic AssociationHarvard Business School Fund — $2,000 · OtherHarvard Business School FundWasmuth Center for Human Rights — $1,500 · OtherIdaho Humane Society Inc — $1,800 · OtherIdaho Humane Society IncRHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · Other+11 more — $3,050 · Other+11 moreSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $6,000 · Arts & CultureSUN VALLEY S…IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC — $4,250 · Arts & CultureIDAHO SHAKES…+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterWomen's and Children's Alliance — $3,000 · Human ServicesCATCH INC — $250 · Human ServicesIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $2,500 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $750 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $500 · Youth Development
Education$42,475Other$30,850Arts & Culture$10,350Housing & Shelter$5,000Human Services$3,250Food & Nutrition$2,500Youth Development$2,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $41,725 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC — $4,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIdaho Humane Society Inc — $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA DELTA TAU FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATCH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPEEDY FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOISE ART MUSEUM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNING LAB INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Alopecia Areata Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Percival Stern Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Four J Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Langan Barber Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joy & Thomas Kealey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph