Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Joy C Hinson-Rider Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$122kInternational$57kEnvironment$16kAnimals$14kSocial Science$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$8,000
SANTA FE OPERA$4,000
SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$4,000
CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE$4,000
NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC$4,000
NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH$3,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$2,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$2,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $4k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $3k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $3k → 9%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $3k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $3k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $3k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $2k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $2k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $2k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $2k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%THE SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE: $3k → 14%NEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH: $2k → 7%COUSTEAU SOCIETY INC: $2k → 9%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $8k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $8k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $8k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $7k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $7k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $7k → 17%INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$214k · 9 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$214k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+27%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $49k · revenue +39%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +53%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • NP
    Negative Population Growth Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +27%
  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
2
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Council of the Americas Inc

Council of the americas is a business organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy throughout the americas. the council's membership consists of…

5
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
6
Arizona Opera Company

Arizona opera elevates the transformative power of storytelling through music - cultivating community and strengthening a state and people as adventurous and diverse as the place they call home.

Arts & Culture
7
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
11
Oregon Symphony Association

The oregon symphony is dedicated to moving music forward. our vision is bold and adventurous: to inspire audiences with exhilarating performances, present the best musicians in a wide range of styles, explore new art forms, shine light on…

Arts & Culture
12
Conservation Music
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Chamber Music Festival Ltd and the most unlike its peers is National Audubon Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SANTA FE OPERA — $28,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERANEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC — $28,000 · Arts & CultureNEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INCSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $28,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTDCHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE — $26,000 · Arts & CultureCHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUEINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $48,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PA…SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $14,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATI…NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $14,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOC…The Cousteau Society Inc — $12,000 · EnvironmentThe Cousteau Society…OCEAN CONSERVANCY — $2,000 · EnvironmentNEGATIVE POPULATION GROWTH — $15,500 · OtherNEGATIVE PO…INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION — $8,000 · OtherINTERNATION…Negative Population Growth Inc — $3,000 · Social Science
Arts & Culture$110,000International$48,500Environment$42,000Other$23,500Social Science$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION — $48,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA — $28,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC — $28,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $28,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE — $26,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cousteau Society Inc — $12,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNegative Population Growth Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
  • Who funds CHAMBER MUSIC ALBUQUERQUE
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds The Cousteau Society Inc
  • Who funds Negative Population Growth Inc
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Joy C Hinson-Rider Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joy C Hinson-Rider Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joy C Hinson-Rider Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph