Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph Sacco Scholarship Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$119k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE$3,750
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT LAFAYETT$1,875
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$1,875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $6k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 11%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $4k → 16%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%STOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $4k → 16%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $2k → 16%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $2k → 11%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 22%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
LA
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$107k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

10%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $19k
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k
  • SJ
    SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $15k

Funded once

  • AU
    ARCADIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +23%
  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • SH
    SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Salle University

Provides a higher education in general and specialized studies

Education
2
University of California

To raise and manage private funds to support uci's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service.

Education
3
San Francisco State University

To provide private financial support to assist the university in meeting its educational mission.

Education
4
La Sierra University

To educate undergraduate and graduate students; to promote research and instruction in multiple areas; and to contribute to the good of the larger society.

Education
5
Augsburg University

A private lutheran four-year university located in downtown minneapolis.

Education
6
California Lutheran University

Clu is an institution offering undergraduate and graduate degrees in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
7
Aurora University

To provide post-secondary undergraduate and graduate education.

Education
8
Claremont Graduate University

A private, independent, nonprofit institution of higher learning that is a high research activity university awarding master's and doctoral degrees within its five schools and three independent departments.

Education
9
Concordia University

Concordia university nebraska's mission is to be an excellent academic and christ-centered community equipping men and women for lives of learning, service and leadership in the church and the world. we primarily do this by providing…

Education
10
Adelphi University

Adelphi university is dedicated to transforming students' lives through small classes, hands-on learning and innovative programs supporting academic and career success.

Education
11
National Council of University Research

To serve all members by advancing expertise in the profession of research administration.

—
12
California State University Fresno

Student Services California State University, Fresno

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is University of California Riverside. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $18,750 · OtherVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVIS: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA- DAVISPALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $9,375 · OtherPALM BEACH STATE COLLEGECOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE: $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORESTOCKTON UNIVERSITY: $3,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE: $3,750 · OtherLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,750 · Other+4 more: $7,500 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSIDAD DEL SAGRADO CORAZON INC: $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSIDAD DEL SA…Cornell University: $3,000 · EducationCornell UniversityARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,875 · EducationARCADIA UNIVERSITY
Other$99,375Education$19,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSIDAD DEL SAGRADO CORAZON INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCADIA UNIVERSITY: $1,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,875 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSIDAD DEL SAGRADO CORAZON INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds ARCADIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michael & Susan Dell FoundationTX14.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph Sacco Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph Sacco Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph Sacco Scholarship Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph Sacco Scholarship Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph Sacco Scholarship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph