Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph L and Ray L Freund Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2022
18
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$236kInternational$88kHousing & Shelter$64kFood & Nutrition$28kEducation$26kHealth$14kReligion$8kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $182k
$9,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA$37,435
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMM$28,773
JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVI$27,722
FUND FOR THE AGED$22,622
MET COUNCIL$21,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
DOROT$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST$14,000
STANLEY ISAACS CENTER$9,000
JASA$8,000
SEARCH & CARE$3,500
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$2,500
LOA MEALS ON WHEELS$2,000
LIGHTHOUSE GUILD$2,000
PROJECT FIND$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST: $14k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OFMETROWEST: $5k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OFMETROWEST: $5k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OFMETROWEST: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OFMETROWEST: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OFMETROWEST: $1k → 8%FUND FOR THE AGED: $23k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $19k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $5k → 17%FUND FOR THE AGED: $5k → 17%SEARCH & CARE: $4k → 17%DOROT: $15k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $10k → 17%DOROT: $5k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$508k · 20 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$508k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+98%

Still filing today

45%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $88k · revenue +24%
  • DI
    DOROT INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $44k · revenue +35%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $28k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NEW JEWISH HOME
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
2
Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…

Health
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
5
Jewish Home Lifecare

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

—
6
The Jewish Association for Services for the Aged

Jasa's mission is to sustain and enrich the lives of the aging in the new york metropolitan area so that they can remain in the community with dignity and autonomy.

Human Services
7
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
8
Kenneth Gladstone Building Housing Development Fund Company Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

Housing & Shelter
9
Mjhs Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis

Human Services
10
Independent Living for Seniors Inc

To meet the health care needs of elderly persons and other individuals who require chronic health care by establishing and maintaining a chronic care management program, including but not limited to: management and coordination of…

Religion
11
Jewish Healthcare Center Inc

The center owns and operates a 141 bed skilled nursing facility that provides inpatient long-term care and recuperative services for its patients.

Health
12
Jewish Senior Life Foundation Inc

See schedule othe primary purpose of the foundation is to generate financial support to sustain the mission of jewish senior life and its affiliates, to enhance the lives of our residents, patients, and their families.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service of Metrowest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Met Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UJA: $87,230 · OtherUJASTANLEY ISAACS CENTER: $69,720 · OtherSTANLEY ISAACS CENTERMet Council Inc: $51,072 · OtherMet Council IncJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVI: $27,722 · OtherJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVIPROJECT FIND: $11,500 · Other+14 more: $54,860 · Other+14 moreFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $51,392 · Human ServicesFUND FOR THE AGED INCDOROT INC: $43,800 · Human ServicesDOROT INCJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC: $28,200 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF …+1 more: $3,500 · Human ServicesThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $88,471 · InternationalThe American Jewi…FRAMINGHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $9,936 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGE: $4,976 · EducationCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $18,000 · Food & NutritionJASA CORPORATION: $8,000 · Community ImprovementWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $1,000 · Health
Other$302,104Human Services$126,892International$88,471Education$24,912Food & Nutrition$18,000Community Improvement$8,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $88,471 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $51,392 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMet Council Inc: $51,072 over 6y, 27% of budgetDOROT INC: $43,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC: $28,200 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRAMINGHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $9,936 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $9,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJASA CORPORATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $4,976 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE AGED INC ↗
  • Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds FRAMINGHAM PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Granite Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds JASA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph L and Ray L Freund Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph L and Ray L Freund Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph L and Ray L Freund Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph L and Ray L Freund Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph L and Ray L Freund’s filings →

More from the funding graph