Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.9MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$1.0MHealth$950kArts & Culture$833kFood & Nutrition$400kCivil Rights$385kScience & Tech$225kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $600k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$45,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Council for Jewish Elderly$300,000
University of Chicago$250,000
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$200,000
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$100,000
Council for Jewish Elderly$100,000
Jewish United Fund$100,000
Jewish United Fund$50,000
Greater Chicago Food Depository$50,000
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$45,000
American Jewish Committee$25,000
Nicklaus Children's Hospital Foundation$25,000
Chicago Botanic Gardens$25,000
DonorsChooseOrg$20,000
Anti Defamation League$20,000
Cara Collective$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Council for Jewish Elderly: $300k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $290k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $200k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $119k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 17 repeat orgs$631k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$8.6M
$591k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+31%

Still filing today

82%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +13%
  • University of Chicago
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +52%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    7× · 2017–2023 · $875k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $125k · revenue +31%
  • KC
    Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
5
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
9
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
12
Computer History Museum

Chm decodes technology - its computing past, digital present, and future impact on humanity.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,760,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO+1 more: $115,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Chicago: $1,000,000 · EducationUniversity of …DONORSCHOOSEORG: $160,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEOR…COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,008,900 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR …Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $875,000 · HealthRehabilita…Smithsonian Institution Portrait Gallery: $400,000 · OtherSmithsonian Instit…Individual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…Illinois Executive Mansion Association: $100,000 · OtherIllinois Executive…Jewish Federation of Metropolitan: $65,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $225,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH CO…ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $160,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LE…CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $125,000 · OtherCHICAGO HORTICULTU…+11 more: $316,824 · Other+11 moreHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $125,000 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $100,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Festival of Israeli Cinema NFP: $30,000 · Arts & CultureOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $400,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$3,875,000Education$1,160,000Human Services$1,008,900Health$875,000Other$1,516,824Arts & Culture$482,500Food & Nutrition$400,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $3,760,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1,008,900 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,000,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $875,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $400,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $225,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $160,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $115,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Executive Mansion Association: $100,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAccess Living of Metropolitan Chicago: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBUZZARDS BAY COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC: $35,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChicago Festival of Israeli Cinema NFP: $30,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC: $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cara Program: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Executive Mansion Association ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BUZZARDS BAY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Festival of Israeli Cinema NFP ↗
  • Who funds OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds METROSQUASH NFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Buzzards Bay Coalition: 37% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph L & Emily K Gidwitz Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph