Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph B Scheller and Rita P Scheller Foundation (Rj Foundation)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.1MHealth$294kArts & Culture$183kReligion$30kPhilanthropy$20kCommunity Improvement$9kScience & Tech$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LITERACY CENTER- LV$30,000
WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE$23,000
BREASTCANCERORG$23,000
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE- INSTITUTE FOR RELIGION CULTURE AND PUBLIC LIFE$15,000
THE CLAY STUDIOTHE CLAYMOBILE$9,500
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPT PROGRAM$6,000
WESTMINSTER CENTER OF FINANCE WELLNESS$5,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE- UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$5,000
ABC OF TETON VALLEY$5,000
HYDE PARK ART CENTER$4,000
ALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM- DOCENT EDUCATIONAL FUND$3,500
IACOCCA GLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTENSIVE$2,000
THE HISPANIC CHAMBER OF LEHIGH VALLEY- FE FOUNDATION$2,000
FLOW THROUGH FROM BAUPOST$46
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $206k → 8%BREASTCANCERORG: $23k → 10%THE LITERACY CENTER- LV: $30k → 11%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $9k → 13%DENNIS R MOORE SCHOLARS: $40k → 15%THE CLAY STUDIOTHE CLAYMOBILE: $10k → 22%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $100k → 11%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $25k → 14%DREYFOOS SCHOOL OF ARTS: $100k → 11%CHICAGO DEBATE: $8k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $202k → 8%BREASTCANCERORG: $18k → 10%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $6k → 13%THE LITERACY CENTER: $30k → 22%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $21k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $202k → 8%BREASTCANCERORG: $13k → 10%WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $6k → 13%THE LITERACY CENTER: $30k → 22%THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $15k → 14%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $9k → 8%BREASTCANCERORG: $13k → 10%THE LITERACY CENTER: $30k → 22%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $15k → 14%BREASTCANCERORG: $9k → 10%THE LITERACY CENTER: $30k → 22%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $10k → 14%THE LITERACY CENTER: $22k → 22%THE LITERACY CENTER: $20k → 22%FE FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%THE LITERACY CENTER: $20k → 22%WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE: $23k → 14%FE FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%THE CLAY STUDIO: $10k → 22%THE CLAY STUDIO: $10k → 22%THE CLAY STUDIO: $8k → 22%THE CLAY STUDIO: $6k → 22%THE CLAY STUDIO: $6k → 22%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE- INSTITUTE FOR RELIGION CULTURE AND PUBLIC LIFE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE- INSTITUTE FOR RELIGION CULTURE AND PUBLIC LIFE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
MA
PA
CA
UT
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$879k · 14 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$879k
$140k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LITERACY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $212k · revenue +6%
  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $200k · revenue +56%
  • WU
    WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • DS
    DREYFOOS SCHOOL OF ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hyde Park Art Center; the most unlike its peers is Breastcancerorg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $634,400 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyTHE LITERACY CENTER: $212,000 · EducationTHE LITERACY CENTERWASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $117,000 · EducationWASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INCMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationMUHLENBERG COLLEGE+1 more: $21,000 · EducationTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $200,000 · HealthTHE SCRIPPS RESEARC…BREASTCANCERORG: $88,594 · HealthBREASTCANCERORGDREYFOOS SCHOOL OF ARTS: $100,000 · OtherDREYFOOS SCHOOL OF…Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…FE FOUNDATION: $39,500 · OtherFE FOUNDATIONMUHLENBERG COLLEGE- INSTITUTE FOR RELIGION CULTURE AND PUBLIC LIFE: $30,000 · OtherMUHLENBERG COLLEGE…THE CLAY STUDIOTHE CLAYMOBILE: $9,500 · Other+12 more: $57,117 · Other+12 moreTHE CLAY STUDIO: $50,100 · Arts & CultureALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM: $10,500 · Arts & CultureHYDE PARK ART CENTER: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,074,400Health$288,594Other$276,117Arts & Culture$64,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $634,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITERACY CENTER: $212,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $117,000 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $88,594 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CLAY STUDIO: $50,100 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM: $10,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHYDE PARK ART CENTER: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BREASTCANCERORG ↗
  • Who funds THE CLAY STUDIO ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ALLENTOWN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HYDE PARK ART CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph B Scheller and Rita P Scheller Foundation (Rj Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph B Scheller and Rita P Scheller Foundation (Rj Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph B Scheller and Rita P Scheller Foundation (Rj Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph