Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Yetta Weisberger Fund Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$66k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Health$109kHuman Services$86kHousing & Shelter$15kInternational$14kEducation$4kFood & Nutrition$4k
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Daughters of Israel$18,000
ANGEL FUND$4,000
LONG HILL TWP COMMUNITY HOUSING$4,000
Sage Eldercare$4,000
SENIOR ADULY ACTIVITY CENTER$4,000
Jewish Family Services$4,000
Deborah Hospital Foundation$4,000
JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES$4,000
Alzheimers New Jersey$4,000
DOROT INC$4,000
St Josephs Rest Home$4,000
COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORP$4,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIN$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOROT INC: $4k → 17%The ARC of Essex County: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$198k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-30%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    Daughters of Israel Inc
    7× · 2020–2026 · $82k · revenue -30%
  • WH
    Weisberger Home for the Elderly
    5× · 2020–2024 · $37k
  • SE
    SAGE ELDERCARE
    7× · 2020–2026 · $15k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +15%
  • DO
    Daughters of Charity
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • SI
    Salk Institute
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
2
Jewish Home of Central New York Senior Apartments Inc

Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…

Housing & Shelter
3
Fund for the Aged Inc

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

Human Services
4
Jha Geriatric Services Inc

Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.

Health
5
Alzheimer's Family Services Center

To improve the quality of life for families challenged by alzheimer's disease or another dementia, through services tailored to meet individual needs.

—
6
Elderhouse Inc

Elderhouse promotes the health and wellbeing of aging adults through a holistic medical model adult day program led by a passionate team of therapeutic recreation professionals, health aides, and nurses specially trained to support the…

Human Services
7
Phoenix Jewish Community Kivel Nursing Home

Operation of assisted living facilities

Health
8
Adult Care Center of Central Virginia Inc

Adult day care for frail older adults, particularly those suffering from some form of dementia.

—
9
Brandman Centers for Senior Care Inc Jewish Home for the Aging

Brandman centers for senior care, inc. provides high quality health care and supportive services to enhance the well being of the frail seniors, caregivers and the community we serve.

Health
10
Collabria Care

The exempt organization's staff and volunteers are committed to providing exceptional professional health care, expert resources, and compassionate support to individuals and their loved ones experiencing the transitions of aging, serious…

Human Services
11
Jewish Home At Home Inc

Providing charitable services to the elderly or infirm to assist them to continue to reside in their home environment.

Human Services
12
Daughters of Sarah Nursing Center Inc

The mission of the daughters of sarah nursing center, inc. is to enhance the quality of life, assure the safety and dignity, and foster the independence of those we serve through residential, personal care, health and other quality…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Daughters of Miriam Center; the most unlike its peers is Flo Okin Cancer Relief Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Daughters of Israel Inc: $82,000 · HealthDaughters of Israel IncALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC: $14,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INCDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $13,500 · HealthDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+1 more: $3,000 · HealthWeisberger Home for the Elderly: $37,001 · OtherWeisberger Home for the ElderlyJewish Family Services: $11,500 · OtherJewish Family ServicesSt Josephs Rest Home: $9,500 · OtherSt Josephs Rest HomeSt Josephs Home for the Elderly: $6,500 · OtherSt Josephs Home for the ElderlyFLO OKIN CANCER RELIEF INC: $6,500 · OtherFLO OKIN CANCER RELIEF INCLONG HILL TWP COMMUNITY HOUSING: $4,000 · OtherSENIOR ADULY ACTIVITY CENTER: $4,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES: $4,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $4,000 · OtherANGEL FUND: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · OtherSAGE ELDERCARE: $14,500 · EducationDOROT INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $1,600 · Human ServicesCOOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATION: $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$112,500Other$94,001Education$14,500Human Services$5,600Housing & Shelter$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDaughters of Israel Inc: $82,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAGE ELDERCARE: $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFLO OKIN CANCER RELIEF INC: $6,500 over 6y, 16% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Daughters of Israel Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAGE ELDERCARE ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds DEBORAH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLO OKIN CANCER RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds DAUGHTERS OF MIRIAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF ESSEX COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Investors Foundation IncNJ13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Investors Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Yetta Weisberger Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Yetta Weisberger Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Arc of Essex County Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Daughters of Miriam Center: 1% of income from government
  • Sage Eldercare: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph & Yetta Weisberger Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & Yetta Weisberger Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Yetta Weisberger’s filings →

More from the funding graph