Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Ruth E Stern Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$54kHealth$27kAnimals$23kFood & Nutrition$23kEducation$16kPhilanthropy$12kEnvironment$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$379k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gentle Giants Draft Horse Rescue$3,500
Wounded Warriors Project$3,000
Pasadena Humane Society$3,000
Leukemia Lymphoma Society$2,100
Int'l Fellowship of Christians and$2,000
St Jude Children's Hospital$2,000
Mercy Chefs$2,000
Food on Foot$2,000
Tunnel To Towers$1,500
Saddleback Community Outreach Inc$1,500
Cousteau Society$1,000
Salvation Army$1,000
Paws for Purple heart$1,000
Prager University$500
Semper K9 assistant Dogs$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $10k → 11%Mercy Chefs: $2k → 20%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $2k → 11%Mercy Chefs: $1k → 20%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $2k → 11%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $2k → 11%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $2k → 11%Saddleback Community Outreach Inc: $2k → 11%American Red Cross: $2k → 14%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%Unsilenced Voices: $500 → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%Food on Foot: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
HI
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$175k · 31 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$175k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+34%

Still filing today

48%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Saddlebrooke Community Outreach Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +29%
  • FO
    FOOD ON FOOT
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +118%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $13k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • MU
    MAUI UNITED WAYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +188%
  • EI
    Ellis Island Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
3
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
4
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
5
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
8
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
9
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
Paws Unite People Inc

Our mission is simple. We support animals and the people who love them when they need it the most through our animal welfare and humanitarian aid programs. We assist shelter, abused, and neglected animals in finding their purpose in life…

Animals
12
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maui Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Unsilenced Voices. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCPaws for Purple heart: $7,000 · OtherPaws for Purple heartSalvation Army: $7,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyTHE SALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMake-A-Wish: $6,500 · OtherMake-A-WishCousteau Society: $5,500 · OtherCousteau SocietyLeukemia Lmphoma Society: $5,300 · OtherLeukemia Lmphoma SocietySteubenville High School: $4,500 · OtherSteubenville High SchoolShriners Hospitals: $3,000 · OtherUniversal Kidney Research Organizat: $3,000 · Other+18 more: $22,100 · Other+18 moreSaddlebrooke Community Outreach Inc: $19,000 · Human ServicesSaddlebrooke Community Outreac…FOOD ON FOOT: $16,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ON FOOTWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & …MERCY CHEFS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS INC+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $8,500 · AnimalsGENTLE GIAN…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICA…PASADENA HUMANE: $3,000 · AnimalsPASADENA HU…GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,900 · AnimalsGREATER LOS…Humane World for Animals Inc: $1,600 · AnimalsHumane Worl…MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $700 · Animals+1 more: $300 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $3,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNITED WAY: $2,000 · PhilanthropyHEROES LINKED: $5,200 · Public BenefitFOR THE TROOPS: $195 · Public Benefit
Other$80,400Human Services$54,500Animals$20,000Health$14,000Education$13,000Philanthropy$12,000Public Benefit$5,395

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSaddlebrooke Community Outreach Inc: $19,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES LINKED: $5,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFriends For Pets Foundation: $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOR THE TROOPS: $195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHoward Jarvis Taxpayer Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Saddlebrooke Community Outreach Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ON FOOT ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds HEROES LINKED ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA HUMANE ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOS ANGELES ZOOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends For Pets Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Ruth E Stern Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Ruth E Stern Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph & Ruth E Stern Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & Ruth E Stern Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Ruth E Stern’s filings →

More from the funding graph