Skip to content
Joseph & Martye Rubin Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Joseph & Martye Rubin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$72kPhilanthropy$21kEducation$19kReligion$13kArts & Culture$11kCommunity Improvement$7kRecreation & Sports$6kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$3,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Beth El$11,000
San Antonio Academy$10,000
Texas Biomedical Research Institute$3,300
Jewish Federation of San Antonio$2,300
SNIPSA Inc$500
Rey Feo Scholarship Foundation$260
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Boysville Inc: $750 → 16%Respite Care of San Antonio: $750 → 16%Connect Ability: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 17 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$107k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+31%

Still filing today

71%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +68%
  • MA
    MCNAY ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +15%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2018–2020 · $3k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • CA
    Connectability at Warm Springs
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • TT
    THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -50%
  • SL
    ST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF SAN
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
3
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
4
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
5
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
7
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
8
Symphony Society of San Antonio

The san antonio symphony's mission is to delight, engage, and inspire the entire community through excellent performance, education, and outreach

—
9
Texas a&M San Antonio Foundation

To furnish Texas AM University-San Antonio with provisions for future and perpetual financial support for its students to help them succeed during college and in the future as valuable contributing members of the community

Education
10
San Antonio Pets Alive Inc

The mission of San Antonio Pets Alive! is to save every adoptable dog and cat in danger of being killed at the City of San Antonio Shelter.

Animals
11
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Public Library Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Temple Beth El: $12,693 · OtherTemple Beth ElSNIPSA Inc: $11,000 · OtherSNIPSA IncSan Antonio Academy: $10,625 · OtherSan Antonio AcademyPlanned Parenthood: $10,200 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodConnectability at Warm Springs: $6,500 · OtherConnectability at Warm SpringsTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF SAN: $5,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF SANSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $2,750 · Other+9 more: $5,470 · Other+9 moreTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $38,440 · HealthTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTIT…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOODPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,660 · Health+1 more: $850 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $18,550 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FED…MCNAY ART MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,650 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $850 · Arts & CultureALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN: $700 · Arts & CultureTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN: $500 · Arts & CultureCONNECTABILITY: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,720 · Human ServicesBOYSVILLE INC: $750 · Human ServicesRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $750 · Human ServicesSAINT MARYS HALL INC: $2,000 · EducationREY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $260 · EducationTexas Agricultural Land Trust: $1,250 · EnvironmentGLOBAL FOOTPRINT NETWORK INC: $500 · Environment
Other$69,238Health$45,200Philanthropy$20,550Arts & Culture$8,700Human Services$8,220Education$2,260Environment$1,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $38,440 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $18,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTABILITY: $5,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST SCHOOL OF ART: $2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $2,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARYS HALL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,970 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,660 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Agricultural Land Trust: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALAMO BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $850 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKinetic Kids Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FOOTPRINT NETWORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Mays Family FoundationElizabeth Huth Coates…John R & Greli N Less…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Betty Stieren Kelso F…The Brown Foundation …The Ewing Halsell Fou…Keith M Orme and Pat …Amy Shelton McNutt Ch…Marcia & Otto Koehler…The Texas Cavaliers C…
San Antonio Area FoundationTX29.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Ewing Halsell Foundation · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation · Amy Shelton McNutt Charitable Trust · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Martye Rubin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Martye Rubin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Martye Rubin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home