Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph and Licia Gimma Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$35kHealth$32kReligion$22kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kEnvironment$8kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$396k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HSS Foundation$5,000
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Int'l$1,500
ST JEAN BAPTISTE CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,500
THE NORWALK MARITIME AQUARIUM$1,000
The Glaucoma Foundation$1,000
MYSTIC SEAPORT$1,000
LOYOLA SCHOOL$1,000
ST JOHN CHURCH$1,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$1,000
Yale New Haven Hospital$1,000
Dragon Boat Charleston$500
ONE80 PLACE$500
Lower Cape Fear LifeCare$500
Semper Fi Fund$500
ST PETER'S UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lower Cape Fear LifeCare: $500 → 12%Regional Hospice: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
NE
TN
NC
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$136k · 19 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$136k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+65%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +56%
  • TG
    THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +56%
  • MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +65%
  • DH
    Danbury Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • RH
    REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Greenwich Hospital

To provide healthcare services.

Health
3
The Miriam Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, TMH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
4
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
5
Portsmouth General Hospital Foundation
—
6
Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries

Sibley memorial hospital in washington, d.c., a member of johns hopkins medicine, has a distinguished history of serving the community since its founding in 1890. as a not-for-profit, full-service community hospital, sibley offers…

Health
7
Rhode Island Hospital

As a founding hospital in the Brown University Health system, RIH is committed to its mission: Delivering health with care.

Health
8
Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc

To improve the health of the region and to provide healthcare services.

Health
9
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Coastal Hospice

Coastal hospice promotes dignity and quality of life for patients and families who face life-limiting conditions.

Human Services
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bagby Foundation for the Musical Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HSS Foundation: $29,000 · OtherHSS FoundationJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Int'l: $15,500 · OtherJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Int'lST JEAN BAPTISTE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $11,500 · OtherST JEAN BAPTISTE CATHOLIC CHURCHST JOHN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST JOHN CHURCHLOYOLA SCHOOL: $9,000 · OtherLOYOLA SCHOOLTHE NORWALK MARITIME AQUARIUM: $8,000 · OtherTHE NORWALK MARITIME AQUARIUMCLICK IT FOR CASSIE INC: $6,750 · OtherCLICK IT FOR CASSIE INCST PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $7,000 · Other+5 moreSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,500 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMER…THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · HealthTHE GLAUCOMA FOU…YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $2,000 · HealthYALE NEW HAVEN H…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…DRAGON BOAT CHARLESTON: $1,000 · HealthMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $6,500 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEA…THE BAGBY FOUNDATION FOR THE MUSICAL ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BAGBY …THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MARITI…One-Eighty Place: $4,500 · Housing & ShelterREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare: $500 · Human Services
Other$100,750Health$20,500Arts & Culture$12,500Housing & Shelter$4,500Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAGBY FOUNDATION FOR THE MUSICAL ARTS INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOne-Eighty Place: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAGON BOAT CHARLESTON: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BAGBY FOUNDATION FOR THE MUSICAL ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds One-Eighty Place ↗
  • Who funds YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAGON BOAT CHARLESTON ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HOSPICE AND HOME CARE OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds Lower Cape Fear Hospice Incorporated dba Lower Cape Fear LifeCare ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC12.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph and Licia Gimma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph and Licia Gimma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph and Licia Gimma’s filings →

More from the funding graph