Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$850k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$875kYouth Development$286kRecreation & Sports$275kEnvironment$150kEmployment$138kArts & Culture$105kAnimals$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION$375,000
HEART OF OREGON CORPS$100,000
PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$50,000
MOUNT RUSHMORE SOCIETY$50,000
LITTLE FLOWER CHURCH$45,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CENTRAL OREGON$40,000
DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
OREGON TECH FOUNDATION$30,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OR$30,000
NDSU FOUNDATION$30,000
ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL$20,000
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE$15,000
RUGBY DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION: $375k → 11%BEND PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%OREGON TECH FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $50k → 17%LITTLE FLOWER CHURCH: $45k → 12%NDSU FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%MOUNT RUSHMORE SOCIETY: $50k → 14%GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250k → 11%BEND PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION: $125k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%OREGON TECH FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $50k → 17%PRAIRE VILLAGE MUSEUM: $25k → 12%NDSU FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION: $250k → 11%HEART OF OREGON CORPS: $100k → 10%ST ANDREWS NATIVITY: $20k → 12%OREGON TECH FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%HEART OF OREGON CORPS: $38k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $20k → 12%OREGON TECH FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%SUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY: $38k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%SUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY: $38k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%SUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY: $38k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $20k → 12%SUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY: $38k → 10%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OR: $30k → 10%ST ANDREW NATIVITY SCHOOL: $20k → 12%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL OR: $30k → 10%ST ANDREWS NATIVITY: $20k → 12%PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $48k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH: $36k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH: $24k → 12%DE LA SALLE NORTH: $24k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $35k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $27k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 21 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
3

Total granted

$2.9M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+7%

Still filing today

48%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentAnimalsEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    Bend Park and Recreation Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue ×11 · 48% of their budget
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN
    5× · 2018–2022 · $126k · revenue +213%
  • OREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • PV
    PRAIRE VILLAGE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • PP
    PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
2
The Oregon Community Foundation

The mission of The Oregon Community Foundation is to improve lives of all Oregonians through the power of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
3
Friends of the Children - Portland Foundation

The foundation raises private donations and manages investments for the future use of friends of the children-portland program. friends of the children-portland provides long-term mentors to portland's most vulnerable children.

Youth Development
4
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
5
Friends of the Columbia Gorge

Ensuring the gorge remains a vibrant, living place wondrous, wild, and accessible for all is at the core of what we do. friends of the columbia gorge works to protect, preserve, and steward the columbia gorge for future generations.

—
6
The Oregon Zoo Foundation

To foster community pride and involvement in the oregon zoo and to secure financial support for the zoo's conservation, education and animal well-being programs.

Animals
7
Oregon Garden Foundation

The mission of the oregon garden foundation is to advance the growth and sustainability of the oregon garden, through philanthropy and thoughtful oversight.

Environment
8
Oregon Parks Forever

Raising funds for programs and projects that enhance the experience of using oregon's parks and forests.

Environment
9
Foundation for Portland Public Schools

The Mission of the Foundation for Portland Public Schools is to be a catalyst for increased educational opportunities, achievement, and equity for all Portland Public Schools students and staff.

Philanthropy
10
Friends of the Children - Sw Washington

We commit to standing alongside our community's youth as they work to overcome barriers to success. each child receives 1:1 support and guidance from a salaried, professional mentor (called a friend), from kindergarten through high school…

Youth Development
11
Friends of Outdoor School

Friends of outdoor school connects, supports, and advocates for all of oregon's diverse students to learn at inclusive and accessible outdoor school programs that contribute to educational development, inspire youth, promote personal…

Education
12
Oregon Council for the Humanities

Oregon humanities is an independent nonprofit organization formed in 1978. oregon humanities connects people and communities through conversation, storytelling, and participatory programs to inspire understanding and collaborative change.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Children-Portland; the most unlike its peers is Oregon Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICE FOUNDATIONBend Park and Recreation Foundation: $250,000 · OtherBend Park and Recreation FoundationPERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $196,000 · OtherPERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTEDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $108,000 · OtherDE LA SALLE NORTH: $108,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $76,000 · Other+12 more: $469,500 · Other+12 moreFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $126,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentOREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · EducationNorth Dakota State University Foundation: $105,000 · EducationSUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $137,500 · EmploymentOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $100,000 · AnimalsHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,207,500Youth Development$226,000Education$225,000Environment$150,000Employment$137,500Animals$100,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBend Park and Recreation Foundation: $250,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY INC: $150,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC: $137,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $126,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNorth Dakota State University Foundation: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $80,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE: $60,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHIGH DESERT MUSEUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bend Park and Recreation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SUNRIVER NATURE CENTER & OBSERVATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OREGON TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HIGH DESERT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND ↗
  • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR22× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Walker Family Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · James F & Marion L Miller Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children- Central Oregon: 16% of income from government
  • High Desert Museum: 11% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children-Portland: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Joseph & Elizabeth Hoffart’s filings →

More from the funding graph