Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$298k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$192kRecreation & Sports$72kReligion$64kHealth$56kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$6kEnvironment$1kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$2,300
Median grant
5
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN TRAFFORD SCHOLARSHIP FDN$150,000
PENN TRAFFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
OAKLAWN HOSPITAL$26,850
ST MARY PARISH$25,000
ST ANDREWS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FOUNTAIN CLINIC$5,000
MARSHALL CHORAL SOCIETY$2,300
MARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
ERNIE TYLER FOUNDATION$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
U FLORIDA ATHLETICS$1,000
MCCT$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$1,000
SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FDN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$133k · 8 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$133k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    ELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $39k · revenue +13%
  • FOUNTAIN CLINIC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +361%
  • TS
    THE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • SU
    SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +11%
  • OF
    OAKLAWN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
2
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Marietta College

Marietta college (mc) provides a strong foundation for a lifetime of leadership, critical thinking, and problem solving. we achieve this mission by offering undergraduates a contemporary liberal arts education and graduate students an…

Education
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
10
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ella E M Brown Charitable Circle; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Penn Trafford Scholarship Foundation: $150,000 · EducationPenn Trafford Scholarship FoundationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY+1 more: $1,500 · EducationPENN TRAFFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT: $50,000 · OtherPENN TRAFFORD SCHOOL DISTRICTST MARY PARISH: $40,500 · OtherST MARY PARISHST PETERS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $23,000 · OtherST PETERS CATHOLIC CHURCHST ANDREWS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOAKLAWN FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Other+10 more: $13,500 · Other+10 moreELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE: $39,350 · HealthELLA E M BROW…FOUNTAIN CLINIC: $6,500 · HealthFOUNTAIN CLIN…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthMARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · PhilanthropyTHE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMARSHALL CHORAL SOCIETY: $7,300 · Arts & CultureMCCT INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $1,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $115 · Recreation & Sports
Education$171,500Other$167,000Health$46,850Philanthropy$9,000Arts & Culture$8,300Human Services$1,000Recreation & Sports$115

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPenn Trafford Scholarship Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE: $39,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHALL CHORAL SOCIETY: $7,300 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFOUNTAIN CLINIC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCCT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Penn Trafford Scholarship Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ELLA E M BROWN CHARITABLE CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL CHORAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SANCTUARY GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds MCCT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Chicago Corp ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Battle Creek Community FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Battle Creek Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph & Carolyn Palchak Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph