Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joseph a Horwath Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$805k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.1MHuman Services$875kReligion$730kHousing & Shelter$692kCommunity Improvement$550kPhilanthropy$435kCrime & Legal$205kEducation$76kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $645k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RISE FKA DEFY VENTURES$150,000
GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEB$75,000
COVENANT CEDARS BIBLE CAMP$75,000
OMAHA FOR US$70,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE$60,000
INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER$50,000
HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS$50,000
FIRST COVENANT CHURCH$50,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$40,000
SIENNA FRANCIS HOUSE$40,000
MONTESSORI COOP SCHOOLS$25,000
THE YATES FUND$20,000
KALAHARI PEOPLES FUND$15,000
COMPASSION IN ACTION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OMAHA FOR US: $70k → 12%OMAHA FOR US: $35k → 12%OMAHA FOR US: $15k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $45k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $42k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $40k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $40k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $40k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $35k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%OPEN DOOR MISSION: $30k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $40k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $40k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $25k → 12%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $20k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $50k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $40k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $40k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $20k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $20k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $15k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $10k → 12%COMPASSION IN ACTION: $10k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $60k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $50k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $40k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $25k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $10k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $10k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $10k → 12%PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE: $5k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $100k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $60k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 12%INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 81% of Joseph a Horwath Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 19%.

Joseph a Horwath Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 19 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$4.7M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+37%

Still filing today

58%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +104%
  • SF
    SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $350k · revenue +36%
  • OF
    Omaha ForUs Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $120k · revenue +197%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YATES FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION
    one grant, 2024 · $60k
  • SC
    STEPHEN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Refugee Empowerment Center

To resettle refugees in nebraska and provide them the support they need to thrive.

—
2
Omaha Home for Boys Foundation

To support the mission of omaha home for boys.

Philanthropy
3
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
4
Nebraska Youth Center

The center operates a group home for troubled youth, ages 12-18, in western nebraska.

—
5
Elevate Omaha Inc

To create a platform to elevate youth voice and equip young people to become leaders who advocate for themselves and their peers, provide insight about youth-driven solutions, and fund possibility to pave the way to a better future.

Community Improvement
6
Carole's House of Hope

Caroles House of Hope provides transitional living for young women and mothers who have aged out of foster care or have become homeless. Our home-like environment, paired with innovative programs and services, encourages self-sufficiency…

Public Benefit
7
Nebraska Enterprise Fund

The nebraska enterprise fund envisions a vibrant small business eco-system where every small and micro business has the opportunity to start, grow and prosper. the nebraska enterprise fund supports underserved communities by providing…

Philanthropy
8
Omaha 100

Our mission is to provide ownership opportunities through public and private partnerships, financing, and technical assistance. by working collaboratively, we aim to expand access to capital in underserved communities, empowering…

Housing & Shelter
9
Mutual of Omaha Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Hopespoke

Hopespoke is dedicated to meeting the mental health needs of children and their families in the lincoln area and surrounding communities through effective and flexible therapeutic partnerships and a commitment to advocacy and positive…

Health
11
Omaha Church Center Inc

None

—
12
Youth Care Inc

To transform the lives of children, adults, and families impacted by mental health, trauma and intellectual disabilities. Our goal is to change problematic and systematic behaviors and thinking to provide a positive outcome for…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Center for Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ventures for Excellence Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $635,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOVENANT CEDARS BIBLE CAMP: $330,000 · OtherCOVENANT CEDARS BIBLE CAMPGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEB: $330,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBFIRST COVENANT CHURCH: $300,000 · OtherFIRST COVENANT CHURCHTHE YATES FUND: $100,000 · Other+9 more: $259,000 · Other+9 moreINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $630,000 · Human ServicesINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTEROPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $302,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MI…PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE INCCOMPASSION IN ACTION INC: $205,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASSION IN ACTION INCTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $125,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYSOmaha ForUs Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesOmaha ForUs IncHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $315,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE CENTER F…GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $258,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS S…VENTURES FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $435,000 · PhilanthropyVENTURES …SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $350,000 · Housing & ShelterSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterYATES FUND: $40,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,954,000Human Services$1,592,000Youth Development$573,000Philanthropy$435,000Housing & Shelter$390,000Community Improvement$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER: $630,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetVENTURES FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION: $435,000 over 8y, 72% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $350,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $315,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE: $302,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $258,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE INC: $210,000 over 8y, 29% of budgetCOMPASSION IN ACTION INC: $205,000 over 8y, 51% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $125,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetOmaha ForUs Inc: $120,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSTEPHEN CENTER INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYATES FUND: $40,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetKALAHARI PEOPLES FUND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetOUTRSPACES: $25,000 over 2y, 24% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERCULTURAL SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VENTURES FOR EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CENTER FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP 4 HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS ↗
  • Who funds Omaha ForUs Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YATES FUND ↗
  • Who funds KALAHARI PEOPLES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTRSPACES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the MidlandsNE19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Midlands · The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Todd and Mary Heistand Family Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joseph a Horwath Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joseph a Horwath Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joseph a Horwath’s filings →

    More from the funding graph