Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Jones Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$56kHealth$25kAnimals$9kHuman Services$8kHousing & Shelter$7kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$800
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$240k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
RECOVERY WORKS$3,000
LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN$1,500
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$1,500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE$1,500
LIGHT MOVEMENT$1,500
SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL$1,000
MOVEMBER FOUNDATION$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $1k → 11%WHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE: $2k → 8%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 12%SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $1k → 11%WHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE: $2k → 8%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $2k → 12%SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $1k → 11%WHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE: $2k → 8%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 12%SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $1k → 11%PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%WHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 7%HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE: $1k → 8%TENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 12%SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $1k → 11%PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%WHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $2k → 7%PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $3k → 7%PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $3k → 7%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $3k → 7%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $3k → 7%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $3k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 12%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $2k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $2k → 12%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $2k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 12%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $2k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 12%ST PAUL'S EPISCOPAL: $2k → 7%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 12%LIGHT MOVEMENT: $2k → 12%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 7%LIGHT MOVEMENT: $2k → 12%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $4k → 7%RECOVERY WORKS: $4k → 7%RECOVERY WORKS: $3k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $3k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 7%LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$110k · 14 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$110k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+17%

Still filing today

36%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyAnimalsEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +57%
  • SM
    SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • TB
    THE BLUE BENCH
    4× · 2018–2021 · $3k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • HM
    HARVEST MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2021 · $800 · revenue -15%
  • JA
    JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $250 · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

2
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

3
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Denver Rescue Mission

The denver rescue mission is changing lives in the name of christ by meeting people at their physical and spiritual points of need with the goal of returning them to society as productive, self-sufficient citizens.

Human Services
8
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
9
Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc

Planned parenthood of the rocky mountains, which includes health centers in colorado, southern nevada, and new mexico, has been helping individuals make responsible choices for over 104 years.pprm empowers individuals and families in the…

Health
10
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
11
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
12
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jeffco Action Center Inc the Action Center and the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherLAKEWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $21,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $10,150 · OtherWHEAT RIDGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $8,800 · OtherTENNYSON CENTER FOR CHILDRENHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTE — $8,150 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTH PLATTETHE SALVATION ARMY — $6,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLIGHT MOVEMENT — $3,000 · Other+3 more — $3,400 · OtherRECOVERYWORKS — $7,000 · HealthRECOVERYWOR…THE BLUE BENCH — $2,900 · HealthTHE BLUE BE…MOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthMOVEMBER FO…PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $8,950 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE …SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationHARVEST MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES — $800 · ReligionDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $750 · Animals
Other$85,800Health$10,900Philanthropy$8,950Education$5,000Religion$800Animals$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $8,950 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRECOVERYWORKS — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLUE BENCH — $2,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES — $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RECOVERYWORKS
  • Who funds SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE BLUE BENCH
  • Who funds MOVEMBER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HARVEST MOUNTAIN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
  • Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Jones Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph