Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jones Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$67kArts & Culture$12kEducation$11kPublic Benefit$7kScience & Tech$5kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$200
Median grant
11
States reached
$105k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$13,000
IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM$1,000
FRIENDS OF SHJ STATE PARK$1,000
MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY$600
US Olympic Committee$250
EARTHWATCH$250
ALZHEIMERS ASSN$250
Individual grant recipient$250
PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF LOUISIANA$250
Individual grant recipient$250
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$200
Individual grant recipient$200
WORLD WAR II MUSEUM$200
ODK FOUNDATION$150
Individual grant recipient$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%ASSUMPTION COLLEGE: $500 → 11%EARTHWATCH: $250 → 16%AVENUE OF FLAGS: $500 → 13%WEST POINT: $1k → 14%EAG FDN: $250 → 15%UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $300 → 9%SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FOUNDATION: $250 → 14%FRIENDS OF LPB: $250 → 19%LA Political Hall of Fame: $3k → 24%OUR LADY OF THE OAKS RETREAT HOUSE: $500 → 28%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%Howard School of Business: $1k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 17%PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF LOUISIANA: $3k → 19%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $2k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%LAKE CHARLES SYMPHONY: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM: $1k → 17%LAKE CHARLES SYMPHONY: $850 → 17%CAJUN NAVY: $500 → 17%BOYS VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%LAKE CHARLES HIGH MEMORIAL: $500 → 17%BOYS VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%FRIENDS OF SHJ STATE PARK: $1k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $700 → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $600 → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 17%Leonard Mitchell Fundraiser: $500 → 17%CITY OF VINTON: $500 → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
CO
VA
KS
NC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$99k · 20 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
24

Total granted

$99k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+40%

Still filing today

35%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +101%
  • LC
    LAKE CHARLES SYMPHONY INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +96%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • LP
    LA Political Hall of Fame
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • HS
    Howard School of Business
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Lsu Foundation

The lsu foundation cultivates and invests in philanthropic partnerships to support and advance lsu's academic priorities.

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
12
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Aura provides innovative, open resources to enable discovery and excellence in research, to unify the astrophysics communities, and to promote public understanding of our universe and the benefits of scientific exploration.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $66,600 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,350 · OtherMCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY+38 more: $21,740 · Other+38 moreIMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $1,200 · Arts & CulturePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,001 · EducationASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $500 · EducationSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation: $500 · EducationTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $250 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationPUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ICIC A: $4,000 · Public BenefitWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 · HealthCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $100 · Civil Rights
Other$95,690Arts & Culture$8,700Education$5,351Public Benefit$4,000Human Services$1,200Recreation & Sports$1,000Health$250Civil Rights$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM INC: $7,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $4,001 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ICIC A: $4,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE CHARLES SYMPHONY INC: $2,100 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAM'S TENT ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOMICRON DELTA KAPPA FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPERIAL CALCASIEU MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF ICIC A ↗
  • Who funds LAKE CHARLES SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ABRAHAM'S TENT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Sigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OMICRON DELTA KAPPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIGER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Southwest LouisianaLA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Southwest Louisiana · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jones Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jones Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Assumption University: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jones Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jones Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jones’ filings →

More from the funding graph