Skip to content
Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road at a glance

· Private foundation

Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$67kHousing & Shelter$65kYouth Development$56kHealth$34kCommunity Improvement$22kHuman Services$21kRecreation & Sports$18kArts & Culture$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CTR$15,000
OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER$10,000
COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER$10,000
HISTORIC PORT OF WASHINGTON PROJECT$5,000
CHILDRENS CANCER PARTNERS$3,500
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF BEAUFORT CO$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER: $11k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER: $10k → 18%COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER: $10k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER: $10k → 18%COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $10k → 18%OPEN DOOR COMMUITY CENTER: $6k → 18%COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $6k → 18%COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$259k · 10 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$259k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+22%

Still filing today

50%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PO
    PURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $56k · revenue +43%
  • OD
    Open Door Community Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +416%
  • CP
    COASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER
    4× · 2021–2025 · $31k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • BC
    Beaufort County United Way Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +22%
  • WA
    WASHINGTON AREA INTERCHURCH SHELTER & KITCHEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue ×14
  • TH
    The Humane Society of Beaufort Countygraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bunyan Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Firefighting/Protection

Public Safety & Disaster
2
North Carolina Beach Inlet and Waterway Association Inc

The organization is working on behalf of North Carolina's coast, and those who love it, by seeking to encourage government action and funding, educate and advocate for effective Federal and State policy, and facilitate environmentally…

Environment
3
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
4
Brunswick Partnership for Housing Inc

The mission of Brunswick County Partnership for Housing is to provide services to individuals and families in Brunswick County who are homeless and advocate for the development of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
5
Pamlico Business Resource Center
Community Improvement
6
Outer Banks Chamber of Commerce Inc

Empower the Outer Banks business community by promoting and developing economic prosperity.

—
7
Elizabeth City Downtown Inc a Revitalization Corporation

To serve the entire community by acting as a catalyst for the revitalization of downtown Elizabeth City and the waterfront while preserving its historical and architectural character.

Arts & Culture
8
Chicamacomico Historical Association Inc

The Associations mission is to preserve and present the history of the Chicamacomico Life-Saving/Coast Guard Station and the history of the Life-Saving Service on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.

—
9
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
10
Port Washington Children's Center

To provide affordable, high quality child care and after school programs for working families in port washington without regard to race, religion, national origin, or economic status.

Human Services
11
Womens Resource Center of Greensboro Inc

To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…

Human Services
12
Anson County Homes of Hope

Provide short-term housing for homeless

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Beaufort County United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Humane Society of Beaufort County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REACHING FOR THE STARS PRESCHOOL: $26,500 · OtherREACHING FOR THE STARS PRESCHOOLWASHINGTON-BEAUFORT COUNTY CHAMBER: $21,500 · OtherWASHINGTON-BEAUFORT COUNTY CHAMBERTHE SALVATION ARMY: $21,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBeaufort County United Way Inc: $11,000 · OtherBeaufort County United Way IncSAFE HARBOR HELPLINE: $10,000 · OtherSAFE HARBOR HELPLINELITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF BEAUFORT CO: $8,000 · OtherLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF BEAUFORT COWASHINGTON AREA INTERCHURCH SHELTER & KITCHEN INC: $8,000 · OtherWASHINGTON AREA INTERCHURCH SHELTER & KITCH…BPAC BEAUFORT PERFORMING ARTS: $5,000 · OtherLITTLE WASHINGTON SS: $5,000 · OtherEAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN LOVE IN ACTION: $5,000 · OtherOpen Door Community Center: $46,500 · Human ServicesOpen Door Community CenterCOASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $30,500 · Human ServicesCOASTAL PREGNANCY CENTERPURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTER: $55,500 · Youth DevelopmentPURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX …CHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S CANCER PAR…Bath High School Preservation Inc: $21,500 · Arts & CultureBath High S…BEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBEAUFORT CO…HISTORIC PORT OF WASHINGTON PROJECT: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC PO…CHOCOWINITY RECREATION DEPARTMENT: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsThe Humane Society of Beaufort County: $5,500 · AnimalsInner Banks Stem Center: $5,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$121,000Human Services$77,000Youth Development$59,000Arts & Culture$31,500Recreation & Sports$17,500Animals$5,500Crime & Legal$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPURPOSE OF GOD ANNEX OUTREACH CENTER: $55,500 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetOpen Door Community Center: $46,500 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetCOASTAL PREGNANCY CENTER: $30,500 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetBath High School Preservation Inc: $21,500 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetBeaufort County United Way Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA INTERCHURCH SHELTER & KITCHEN INC: $8,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetThe Humane Society of Beaufort County: $5,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetInner Banks Stem Center: $5,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLITTLE WASHINGTON SS: $5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBEAUFORT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHISTORIC PORT OF WASHINGTON PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetEAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN LOVE IN ACTION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eddie and Jo Allison …The Cannon Foundation…Tri-County Telephone …North Carolina Commun…Amazonsmile Foundation
Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation IncNC17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eddie and Jo Allison Smith Family Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Tri-County Telephone Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road?

    Find your warmest path to Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jonathan Havens Charitable Trust 4242 Six Forks Road’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home