· Private foundation
Jonathan Cs Cox Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASA DE PAZ | $2,020 |
| THE ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| MACALESTER COLLEGE | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $750 |
| MARY'S PLACE | $750 |
| REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE | $750 |
| SONS & DAUGHTERS OF HAWLEY | $500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $500 |
| NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT | $500 |
| THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE | $500 |
| EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL | $300 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST | $250 |
| HIGH COUNTRY NEWS | $208 |
| GROUNDWORK | $208 |
| DENVER URBAN GARDENS | $208 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EWETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +35%
- TCTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +61%
- CDCasa De Paz6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- SCSCHWAB CHARITABLEone grant, 2024 · $150k
- RCRE CIRCLE AT PAUL MILSTEIN CTRone grant, 2018 · $3k
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CTRone grant, 2017 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.
Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.
Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Community organization dedicated to advancing a deep understanding of global affairs and cultures.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Public Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Institute of Contemporary Art Miami Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds Casa De Paz ↗
- Who funds MACALESTER COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds 350ORG ↗
- Who funds The Versailles Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN CARD VOICES ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds EMMA WILLARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds Wood River Community Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLOURISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KING STREET CO-OP PRE-SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RICHARD HUGO HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE FUND NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Town Hall Association ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE WASHINGTON MARKET SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The Denver Foundation · Thrasher Koffey Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · Franklin Weinberg Fund · Spur Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jonathan Cs Cox Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.