Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jonathan and Susan Dolgen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$244k
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$424kArts & Culture$315kCivil Rights$255kEducation$244kReligion$144kRecreation & Sports$58kHealth$33kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA FOUNDATION$68,700
CALIFORNIA INST OF THE ARTS$54,440
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$25,000
POWER TO DECIDE$20,000
MACCABI WORLD UNION$15,000
PITZER COLLEGE$10,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$7,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$5,000
CALIFORNIA STATE SUMMER SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS$5,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$5,000
WOOD RIVER JEWISH COMMUNITY$4,050
STEPHEN WISE TEMPLE$3,685
RAMAH DAROM CLAYTON CAMPUS$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,500
MACCABI USA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%POWER TO DECIDE: $20k → 14%4PAWS FOR ABILITY: $100 → 9%POWER TO DECIDE: $4k → 14%MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND: $1k → 14%MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND: $1k → 14%FLOURISH FOUNDATION: $250 → 7%MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND: $1k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$938k · 43 repeat orgs$515k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
30

Total granted

$938k
$502k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-1%

Still filing today

63%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +102%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS
    4× · 2020–2024 · $219k · revenue +14%
  • PC
    Pitzer College
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • 2C
    26 CHARITIES-AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
    one grant, 2019 · $409k
  • CI
    CAKUF INSTITATE OF THE ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $53k
  • MS
    MILKEN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
7
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
8
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Leadership Academy; the most unlike its peers is Sun Valley Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
29/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

26 CHARITIES-AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $409,457 · Other26 CHARITIES-AVAILABLE UPON REQUESTVALLEY BETH SHALOM DAY SCH: $93,795 · OtherVALLEY BETH SHALOM DAY SCHCAKUF INSTITATE OF THE ARTS: $52,850 · OtherCAKUF INSTITATE OF THE ARTSUC REGENTS: $43,500 · OtherUC REGENTS+54 more: $184,876 · Other+54 moreSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INCCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $219,213 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS+6 more: $29,230 · Arts & Culture+6 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $103,700 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATI…Pitzer College: $30,200 · EducationPitzer Colleg…Cornell University: $20,050 · EducationCornell Unive…The Space Idaho Inc: $15,500 · EducationThe Space Ida…Sun Valley Community School Inc: $13,000 · EducationSun Valley Co…+3 more: $2,900 · EducationMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOWER TO DECIDE: $23,500 · Human ServicesMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $3,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $350 · Human ServicesCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $7,000 · HealthST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,250 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,500 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $1,000 · HealthMACCABI USA INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$784,478Arts & Culture$498,443Education$185,350Youth Development$40,000Human Services$27,850Health$20,750Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $219,213 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $103,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPitzer College: $30,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER TO DECIDE: $23,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCornell University: $20,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Space Idaho Inc: $15,500 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetGEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC: $15,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSun Valley Community School Inc: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCORNELL HILLEL: $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO: $10,465 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL INC: $5,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetACADEMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO BASE CAMP INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUN VALLEY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPOT: $900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION: $750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT: $450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShoshone Project Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLOURISH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MACCABI WORLD UNION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pitzer College ↗
  • Who funds POWER TO DECIDE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds The Space Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds Sun Valley Community School Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORNELL HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds WOOD RIVER LAND TRUST CO ↗
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
  • Who funds MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND ↗
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY SUMMER SYMPHONY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spur Community Foundation IncID17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spur Community Foundation Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Springcreek Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Gift Fund · Sam and Peggy Grossman Family Foundation · Stewart Family Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The New York Community Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jonathan and Susan Dolgen Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jonathan and Susan Dolgen Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jonathan and Susan Dolgen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph