Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jon M Vogel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$163kPublic Safety & Disaster$68kFood & Nutrition$53kInternational$35kHousing & Shelter$20kEducation$10kCivil Rights$5kScience & Tech$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSP$50,000
RUTH NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SVC$15,000
DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
American Friends of Magen David Ado$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$10,000
TIKVA$10,000
JARC FLORIDA$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$5,000
THE PAP CORPS$5,000
birthright israel foundation$5,000
JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSP$2,500
CANDLELIGHTERS NYC$2,000
american heart association$1,000
florida sheriffs association$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%hands on tzedakah: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 12 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$310k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +37%
  • JA
    JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +29%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $11k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • TH
    trustbridge hospice foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -33%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +253%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Physicians for Palestine
Health
6
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
7
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
American Friends of Migdal Ohr

Migdal Ohr means "tower of light" in Hebrew and serves as a beacon of hope to thousands of orphaned and neglected children. We serve over 10,000 children every year and raise them to become thriving, successful adults. Migdal Ohr gives…

Youth Development
10
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
11
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
12
Israel Healthcare Foundation Inc

To assist israelis, by providing grants to hospitals and clinics in israel.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $68,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONRUTH NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SVC: $52,500 · OtherRUTH NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SVCTHE PAP CORPS: $12,500 · OtherTHE PAP CORPSDAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH: $10,000 · OtherDAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH+4 more: $11,200 · Other+4 moreBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $100,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital IncJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · HealthJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC+3 more: $7,500 · Health+3 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT …FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterTIKVA CORP: $10,000 · EducationANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 · Civil RightsHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPLAY FOR PINK INC: $750 · Crime & Legal
Other$154,200Health$131,000International$35,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Education$10,000Civil Rights$5,000Human Services$2,000Crime & Legal$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANDLELIGHTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHANDS ON TZEDAKAH INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jon M Vogel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jon M Vogel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jon M Vogel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph