Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Johnson & Wales University

The mission of JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY (jwu) is to provide an exceptional education that inspires professional success and lifelong personal and intellectual growth.

$110M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0172% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$162kRecreation & Sports$20kArts & Culture$10kInternational$10kPublic Benefit$6kEmployment$6kOther$83k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $16,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $110,104,168 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $110,088,168 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$774M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT$10,000
SPORTS BIZ CARES LTD$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED WAY OF MIAMI DADE: $6k → 15%FL RESTAURANT & LODGING ASSOCIATION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 19%SPORTS BIZ CARES LTD: $6k → 10%UNITED STATES CHALLENGE CUP: $8k → 14%COLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION: $7k → 12%GREATER MIAMI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $6k → 15%FLORIDA RESTAURANT & LODGE: $15k → 19%DOWNTOWN PROVIDENCE PARK NETWORK: $10k → 14%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DENVER: $10k → 12%FLORIDA RESTAURANT & LODGE: $15k → 19%PROVIDENCE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: $10k → 14%FL RESTAURANT & LODGE: $11k → 19%FIRSTWORKS: $10k → 14%RI PUBLIC EXPENDITURE COUNCIL: $6k → 14%UNITED WAY OF RI: $60k → 14%UNITED WAY OF RI: $41k → 14%UNITED WAY OF RI: $31k → 14%UNITED WAY OF RI: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 49% of Johnson & Wales University’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in RI; read by stated purpose it is 62% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Johnson & Wales Universitylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charlotte Regional Realtor Association Inc

The charlotte regional realtor (r) association (crra) is a trade association serving members in mecklenburg, iredell and haywood counties. at december 31, 2024, crra had 14,020 members.

2
Preserve Rhode Island

Preserve ri's vision is a future where historic preservation creates positive change, making our diverse cultures, the environment, and the economy better for the people who live, visit and work in rhode island. preserve ri's mission is to…

Arts & Culture
3
The Rhode Island Community Foundation

The rhode island foundation mobilizes generosity and motivates change that makes a difference

Philanthropy
4
Rhode Island Marine Trade Association

Rimta's mission is to champion the rhode island marine industry through advocacy, education, environmental stewardship, innovation and promotion.

5
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

6
The Recycling Partnership Inc

Our mission is to build a better recycling system, one that delivers the economic and environmental benefits our communities and the hundreds of thousands of people who work throughout the recycling industry deserve.

Environment
7
Counselors of Real Estate

Cre was established exclusively for real estate advisors who provide intelligent, unbiased, and trusted advice for a client or employer. the purpose of the organization is to serve as an information resource and to provide its members with…

Community Improvement
8
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
9
Harrison Hotel Inc

The organization serves as the general partner for a limited partnership that owns and operates affordable housing for the benefit of 131 low-income tenants.

10
The Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce

Promote businesses through the organization of various meetings, functions, and programs.

11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

12
Wayside House Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crossroads Rhode Island and the most unlike its peers is Us Challenge Cup Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%10%<5yr16%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr11%15%35–55yr14%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%9%<5yr16%3%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr11%7%35–55yr14%77%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%1/26
the rest of the field
16%
2,475/15,666

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $156,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INCUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $6,401 · PhilanthropyTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE FLORIDA RESTAURANT AND LODGING ASSOCIATION INC — $55,513 · OtherTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE…US Challenge Cup Inc — $7,500 · OtherUS Challenge Cup IncCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION — $7,360 · OtherCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONDENVER INNOCENCE PROJECT — $7,360 · OtherDENVER INNOCENCE PROJECTGREATER MIAMI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $5,600 · OtherGREATER MIAMI CHAMBER OF COMMER…DOWNTOWN PROVIDENCE PARKS NETWORK — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRSTWORKS — $10,000 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $10,000 · InternationalRHODE ISLAND PUBLIC EXPENDITURE COUNCIL — $6,098 · Public BenefitSPORTS BIZ CAREERS LTD — $6,000 · Employment
Philanthropy$162,401Other$83,333Recreation & Sports$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000International$10,000Public Benefit$6,098Employment$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC — $156,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF THE FLORIDA RESTAURANT AND LODGING ASSOCIATION INC — $55,513 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN PROVIDENCE PARKS NETWORK — $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFIRSTWORKS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUS Challenge Cup Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCOLORADO RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION — $7,360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC — $6,401 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRHODE ISLAND PUBLIC EXPENDITURE COUNCIL — $6,098 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPORTS BIZ CAREERS LTD — $6,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER MIAMI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Citizens Charitable FoundationRI18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Citizens Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Collette Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Champlin Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Johnson & Wales University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • United Way Miami Inc23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $120M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph