Skip to content

· Private foundation

John William Rollison Jr Education Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$332kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$948k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY$7,650
WILLIAM AND MARY COLLEGE$7,650
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY$6,300
COLLEGE OF THE ALBERMARLE$4,325
CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY CNU$4,200
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$4,200
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$3,950
REGENT UNIVERSITY$3,700
MEREDITH COLLEGE$3,700
VIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$3,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MEREDITH COLLEGE: $4k → 8%COLLEGE OF THE ALBERMARLE: $4k → 15%EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $6k → 20%WILLIAM AND MARY COLLEGE: $8k → 7%VIRGINIA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY CNU: $4k → 17%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 29%REGENT UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 22 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$302k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+39%

Still filing today

27%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $16k · revenue +67%
  • RU
    REGENT UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +54%
  • RC
    RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • VP
    VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • PD
    PAUL D CAMP COMMUNITY CO
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
5
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
6
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
9
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
10
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
11
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
12
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Liberty University Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $36,400 · OtherVIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYVIRGINIA TECH: $30,250 · OtherVIRGINIA TECHLONGWOOD UNIVERSITY: $24,750 · OtherLONGWOOD UNIVERSITYOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY: $23,250 · OtherOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITYEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $19,600 · OtherEAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITYWILLIAM AND MARY COLLEGE: $15,650 · OtherWILLIAM AND MARY COLLEGECHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY CNU: $13,700 · OtherNORFOLK STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,250 · Other+18 more: $70,725 · Other+18 moreLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $16,200 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVER…CHOWAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · EducationCHOWAN UNIVERS…MEREDITH COLLEGE: $5,700 · EducationMEREDITH COLLE…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE: $3,000 · EducationRANDOLPH-MACON…FERRUM COLLEGE: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · Education
Other$289,575Education$43,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $16,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHOWAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEREDITH COLLEGE: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFERRUM COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGEWATER COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHOWAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REGENT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FERRUM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEWATER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA UNION UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Alice M & William E Johnson Foundation · Hughes Memorial Home · Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John William Rollison Jr Education Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John William Rollison Jr Education Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John William Rollison Jr Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph