Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Stites Jazz Artist Organization

The jsjao is a charitable organization which funds advanced studies for jazz musicians and concerts, competitions, and projects that expand jazz audiences and the appreciation of jazz in the community.

$198k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$828kCommunity Improvement$75kEducation$45kSocial Science$14kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$6,725
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$80,000
KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALTI$25,000
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$21,127
Individual grant recipient$10,171
Individual grant recipient$8,416
Individual grant recipient$8,072
Individual grant recipient$7,496
Individual grant recipient$6,725
KEEGAN MARSHALL-HOUSE$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,513
JAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,165
Individual grant recipient$1,485
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAZZBOSTON: $7k → 16%TWIN CITIES JAZZ FESTIVAL: $8k → 14%JAZZ INSPIRED INC: $8k → 7%NICK WEISER: $7k → 18%MIRANDA AGNEW: $7k → 20%LISA SUNG: $5k → 11%ALLEN CHAPEL AME CHURCH: $25k → 12%FOUNDRY HALL: $5k → 14%LAKE EFFECT JAZZ BIG BAND: $9k → 15%HART PERFORMING ARTS ASSOC: $8k → 16%JAZZ ON WHEELS: $8k → 16%TUBA BACH INC: $10k → 20%BRAUN KHAN: $6k → 12%CITYMUSIC CLEVELAND: $15k → 17%JOHN DAMBERG: $3k → 10%SOUTHSIDE JAZZ COALITION: $16k → 14%KEEGAN MARSHALL-HOUSE: $6k → 23%TWIN CITIES JAZZ FESTIVAL: $5k → 14%JAZZ INSPIRED INC: $5k → 7%MAXWELL BESSESSEN: $8k → 20%GILMORE FESTIVAL: $170k → 12%FOUNDRY HALL: $960 → 14%HART PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCI: $1k → 16%JAZZ ON WHEELS: $4k → 16%SOUTHSIDE JAZZ COALITION INC: $2k → 14%THE GILMORE: $131k → 12%JAZZ ON WHEELS: $1k → 16%JAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK: $5k → 14%THE GILMORE: $80k → 12%JAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK: $5k → 14%GILMORE FESTIVAL: $70k → 12%GUSTAVO CORTINAS FOUILLOUX: $10k → 14%KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALAT: $25k → 12%KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALTI: $25k → 12%KALAMAZOO NFP ADVOCACY COALITION: $15k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCH: $15k → 12%GILMORE PIANO FESTIVAL: $15k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $8k → 12%KALAMAZOO NFP ADVOCACY COALITION: $8k → 12%KALAMAZOO NFP ADVOCACY COALITION: $5k → 12%KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 12%EDISON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN: $25k → 12%KEITH HALL: $1k → 12%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%ANDREW RATHBUN: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
UT
MO
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$787k · 19 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$787k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+12%

Still filing today

32%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $240k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $211k
  • KN
    KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION
    3× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue -77%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALLEN CHAPEL AME CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • EN
    EDISON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +123%
  • IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +172%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Jazz Festival Inc
Arts & Culture
2
Rising Jazz Stars
Arts & Culture
3
Toledo Jazz Festival

To produce and maintain world class jazz performances in downtown Toledo coupled with advanced educational programs to develop long term interest understanding and audience growth in jazz as Americas original art form within and around the…

Arts & Culture
4
LEau Claire Jazz Society Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Grand Island Music Series
Arts & Culture
6
The Jazz Mentors Foundation
Arts & Culture
7
Vanguard Concerts
—
8
Michigan Jazz Festival

Promote jazz music through free concerts and individual concerts. money is raised through fundraisers to pay for expenes relating to the festival.

Arts & Culture
9
Soundwall Music Initiative

The sound wall music initiative is dedicated to promoting and celebrating the art of music in the auburn/opelika area. we strive to enhance our community through life performances support for music education and artist development.

Arts & Culture
10
Colorado Jazz Ambassadors
Arts & Culture
11
Jazz Central Studios

Jazz Central Studios is dedicated to preserving the innovative jazz arts in the Twin Cities. We present live music to the community in a non-commercial listening environment and encourage collaboration and education among musicians of wide…

Arts & Culture
12
Sebago Long Lake Region Chamber Music Festival Inc

Summer classical music festival

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citymusic Cleveland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jazz Inspired Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $210,545 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $42,254 · OtherWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $27,883 · OtherALLEN CHAPEL AME CHURCH: $25,000 · Other+22 more: $199,030 · Other+22 moreKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25,000 · Arts & CultureKALAMAZOO SYM…South Side Jazz Coalition Inc: $18,000 · Arts & CultureSouth Side Ja…IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD: $15,000 · Arts & CultureIRVING S GILM…CITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCITYMUSIC CLE…JAZZ INSPIRED INC: $12,610 · Arts & CultureJAZZ INSPIRED…TUBA BACH INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTUBA BACH INCJAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJAZZ EDUCATIO…JazzBoston Inc: $6,800 · Arts & CultureJazzBoston In…Foundry Hall: $6,400 · Arts & CultureFoundry HallKALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $65,000 · Community ImprovementKALAMAZOO …EDISON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementEDISON NEI…MICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC: $14,000 · Religion
Other$744,712Arts & Culture$118,810Community Improvement$90,000Religion$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION: $65,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetEDISON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetKALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSouth Side Jazz Coalition Inc: $18,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetIRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC: $14,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetJAZZ INSPIRED INC: $12,610 over 2y, 16% of budgetTUBA BACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetJAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJazzBoston Inc: $6,800 over 1y, 32% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KALAMAZOO NONPROFIT ADVOCACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds EDISON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds South Side Jazz Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds IRVING S GILMORE INTERNATIONAL KEYBOARD ↗
  • Who funds CITYMUSIC CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN FESTIVAL OF SACRED MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ INSPIRED INC ↗
  • Who funds TUBA BACH INC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ EDUCATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds JazzBoston Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foundry Hall ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marvin and Rosalie Okun FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Irving S Gilmore Foundation · Stucki Family Foundation · The Burdick-Thorne Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Stites Jazz Artist Organization funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Stites Jazz Artist Organization. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Stites Jazz Artist Organization?

    Find your warmest path to John Stites Jazz Artist Organization through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Stites Jazz Artist Organization’s filings →

    More from the funding graph