Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$917k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.7MArts & Culture$1.5MYouth Development$740kHealth$681kHuman Services$162kPhilanthropy$134kEnvironment$125kCommunity Improvement$82kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $552k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 99% of reported assets are held in Bernstein & Co Securities.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$150,000
TITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUND$125,000
Individual grant recipient$80,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$66,667
WQLN$65,000
FRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL$65,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
TITUSVILLE SHADE TREE COMMISSION$40,000
BENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY$35,000
BARROW CIVIC THEATRE$30,000
TITUSVILLE AREA UNITED WAY$25,659
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$22,000
TITUSVILLE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
SENECA HILLS BIBLE CAMP$20,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN PA$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO CNTY: $7k → 14%TITUSVILLE AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COR: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 95%.

John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Foulessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 32 repeat orgs$491k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
26

Total granted

$4.9M
$486k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +11%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $315k · revenue +45% · 40% of their budget
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 532 FRENCH CREEK COUNCIL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $213k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - TITUSVIL
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • AT
    ACADEMY THEATRE
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
  • PS
    PENN STATE BEHREND CAMPUS
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware County Historical Society

Acquire and preserve property and information of historic value and/or interest concerning delaware county, pennsylvania. the society also operates a research library and museum.

Arts & Culture
2
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
3
Allegheny Highlands Council Inc

Scouting activities

—
4
Pennsylvania Organization for Watersheds and Rivers Inc

Pennsylvania organization for watersheds and rivers (powr) provides the tools, training, education and resources that empower community watershed organization leaders and volunteers to protect and restore rivers and streams, advocate for…

Environment
5
Tioga County Historical Society

Local historical education operation of a museum and provision of education relating to the history of tioga county pennsylvania

Arts & Culture
6
Pike County Public Library Inc

Provides free library services to residents of pike county, pennsylvania

—
7
Pennsylvania Recreation and Park Society

The pennsylvania recreation and park society empowers recreation and park professionals and citizen advocates to enhance life-enriching services for all pennsylvanians.

Recreation & Sports
8
Watauga Valley Railroad Historical Society & Museum

Education regarding railway history; railway car preservation; railway car excursions

Arts & Culture
9
Auburn Civic Symphony

The auburn civic symphony provides opportunities for foothill area musicians, composers, and audiences to share enriching musical experiences.

Arts & Culture
10
Northeastern Pennsylvania Educational Television Association

Wvia public media is a catalyst, convener and educator, using media, partnerships, powerful ideas and programs to improve lives and advance the best attributes of an enlightened society.

Arts & Culture
11
Iroquois Trail Council Inc - Boy Scouts of America

The council is a not for profit organization devoted to promoting, within the territory covered by charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america in accordance with the congressional program, the ability of boys, young…

—
12
Bright's Creek Conservancy Inc

Conservation efforts to study and maintain brights creek in canadensis, pa.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts Western Pennsylvania; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation for Sustainable Forests Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER INC: $450,000 · OtherTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $356,714 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL INC: $315,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL INCUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL SC: $300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL SCTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUND: $225,000 · OtherTITUSVILLE AREA HEALTH CENTER FOUNDTITUSVILLE AREA UNITED WAY: $218,734 · OtherTITUSVILLE AREA UNITED WAYBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 532 FRENCH CREEK COUNCIL: $213,320 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 532 FRENCH CREEK COUNCILBARROW CIVIC THEATRE: $180,000 · Other+39 more: $1,362,337 · Other+39 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,033,334 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBUR…+1 more: $30,000 · EducationPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA INC: $390,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADC…Oil Creek Railway Historical Society Inc: $99,628 · Arts & CultureOil Creek Rai…BRIDGE STUDIOS: $68,976 · Arts & CultureBRIDGE STUDIO…TITUSVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INCORPORATED: $57,720 · Arts & CultureTITUSVILLE CO…Erie Philharmonic Inc: $34,500 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO COUNTY INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTITUSVILLE AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COR: $1,750 · Human ServicesEMERGYCARE INC: $6,375 · HealthThe Foundation for Sustainable Forests Inc: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,621,105Education$1,063,334Arts & Culture$650,824Youth Development$40,000Human Services$8,750Health$6,375Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,033,334 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA INC: $390,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL INC: $315,000 over 5y, 40% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 532 FRENCH CREEK COUNCIL: $213,320 over 6y, 10% of budgetOil Creek Railway Historical Society Inc: $99,628 over 2y, 22% of budgetBENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $85,889 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetBRIDGE STUDIOS: $68,976 over 6y, 29% of budgetTITUSVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INCORPORATED: $57,720 over 6y, 29% of budgetSENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Warren PA: $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetErie Philharmonic Inc: $34,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTITUSVILLE REGIONAL LITERACY COUNCIL: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetOIL CREEK 100 TRAIL RUNS: $15,600 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetWOMEN'S SERVICES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF VENANGO COUNTY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMERGYCARE INC: $6,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Sustainable Forests Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTITUSVILLE AREA SENIOR CITIZENS COR: $1,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF NORTHWEST PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DRAKE WELL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 532 FRENCH CREEK COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Oil Creek Railway Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENSON MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE STUDIOS ↗
  • Who funds TITUSVILLE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SENECA HILLS BIBLE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Warren PA ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Erie Philharmonic Inc ↗
  • Who funds TITUSVILLE REGIONAL LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OIL CREEK 100 TRAIL RUNS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Erie Community FoundationPA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Erie Community Foundation · Arthur W Phillips Trust Uw · The Five M Foundation · Fleming Family Foundation · Northwest Charitable Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou?

    Find your warmest path to John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Nesbit Rees & Sarah Henne Rees Charitable Fou’s filings →

    More from the funding graph