Skip to content

· Private foundation

John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$284kHuman Services$277kEducation$263kPhilanthropy$122kYouth Development$82kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kHousing & Shelter$32kArts & Culture$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $94k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,000
WINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,000
WINCHESTER DAY PRESCHOOL$10,000
FREMONT STREET NURSERY$10,000
WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION - SHENANDOAH ONCOLOGY ANGEL FUND$8,000
SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC$8,000
HENRY AND WILLIAM EVANS HOME$8,000
THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE$7,000
BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE$6,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$6,000
C-CAP (CONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT)$6,000
DENTAL CLINIC OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY$5,000
WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION - CAMP FOLLOW THE LEADER$5,000
FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS - BRIGHT FUTURES PROGRAM$5,000
FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%HENRY AND WILLIAM EVANS HOME: $8k → 16%HENRY AND WILLIAM EVANS HOME: $8k → 16%HENRY AND WILLIAM EVANS HOME: $7k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $6k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $6k → 16%FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP: $4k → 16%FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP: $4k → 16%FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 97% of John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 5%.

John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trusteelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 33 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
2

Total granted

$1.1M
$7k

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FREMONT STREET NURSERY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +196%
  • TL
    THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +47%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SHENANDOAH VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Virginias House a Family Resource Center
Human Services
3
The Winchester Learning Center

To provide affordable, quality childcare, preschool, & family resources. a united way agency.

Human Services
4
New River Family Shelter Inc

To provide safe emergency and transitional shelter throughout the New River Valley connecting families with supportive services that empower them to make behavioral changes that promote self sufficiency and stability.

Human Services
5
Harvest Freewill Baptist Childcare Ministries Inc

The organization is operated as a emergency shelter and home for abused, neglected and troubled children of southwest virginia. it provides services for the local departments of social services. it is paid on a fee for service basis by…

Religion
6
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
7
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

—
8
Little Hands Virginia Inc

Little hands virginia's mission is to ensure young children in need in central virginia have essentials from day one to improve outcomes for life.

Human Services
9
Womens Daytime Drop-in Center

Womens Daytime Drop-In Center (WDDC) addresses the needs of unhoused women andchildren to ensure they have access to all available services, where they receivefree meals, hygiene products, support groups and other resources to…

Human Services
10
Branches Domestic Violence Shelter Inc

Crisis counseling and shelter

Human Services
11
Fauquier Family Shelter Services

To provide short term shelter, transitional housing and comprehensive services, means, and guidance to homeless and potentially homesless families in our community.

Housing & Shelter
12
Shelter House Inc

Shelter House's mission is to prevent and end homelessness and domestic violence by engaging the community, building effective relationships and providing crisis intervention, safe housing and supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $91,000 · OtherFREDERICK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSWINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $89,000 · OtherWINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCITY OF WINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $73,000 · OtherCITY OF WINCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLSUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $69,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INCSALVATION ARMY: $52,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYEVANS HOME FOR CHILDREN: $41,000 · OtherEVANS HOME FOR CHILDRENWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC: $37,000 · OtherC-CAP OF WINCHESTER: $36,000 · OtherTHE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $29,000 · Other+14 more: $199,000 · Other+14 moreTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $55,000 · Human ServicesTHE LAUREL CENTER…BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $54,000 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPIC…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $29,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National…HENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesHENRY & WILLIAM E…FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP: $12,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES REACHING…DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $70,000 · HealthDR TERRY SI…DENTAL CLINIC OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $45,000 · HealthDENTAL CLIN…FREMONT STREET NURSERY: $75,000 · EducationWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY PROMISE NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $8,000 · Housing & ShelterSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $19,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$716,000Human Services$173,000Health$115,000Education$75,000Housing & Shelter$32,000Arts & Culture$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREMONT STREET NURSERY: $75,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $70,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $69,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $55,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $54,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDENTAL CLINIC OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $45,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetWINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC: $37,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $29,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $29,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC: $23,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $19,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC: $14,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP: $12,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetWINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FREMONT STREET NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENTAL CLINIC OF NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER DAY NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HENRY & WILLIAM EVANS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER AREA TEMPORARY THERMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES REACHING OUT GROUP ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINCHESTER RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley IncVA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · The Woltz-Winchester Foundation · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Dorothy M Overcash Charitable Trust First Bank Trustee · Andrew U Ferrari Foundation · The Brandt Foundation · The Clara Weiss Fund · Feltner Community Foundation · Ridgeway Em-Charittuw

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph