Skip to content

· Private foundation

John J and Georgiana Theodore Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$9kReligion$2kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$1kInternational$750Philanthropy$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Human Services$250Other$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF BRETHREN$500
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$500
ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY FRIDAY HARBOR$500
MONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL MICHAEL$500
SEATTLE SYMPHONY$250
PACIFIC MUSIC WORKS$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 7 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$14k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+75%

Still filing today

71%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $950 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    Northwest Opera in Schools Etcetera
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k
  • TP
    THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +23%
  • PO
    PROJECT OPPORTUNITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k

Funded once

  • HA
    HOLY APOSTLES
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • EB
    E B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

—
2
Philharmonia Northwest

Philharmonia Northwest contributes to the vitality of the classical music community in the Pacific Northwest by presenting professional concerts highlighting the diverse past and present repertoire for chamber orchestra. It is also…

Arts & Culture
3
Portland Baroque Orchestra

Pbo creates transformative experiences for musicians and listeners who share in the exploration and celebration of historically inspired music. the professional orchestra presents world-class performances on period instruments for up to…

Arts & Culture
4
Camerata Pacifica

Camerata Pacifica's mission is to affect positively how people experience live performances of classical music. The Organization will engage our audience intellectually and emotionally by presenting the finest performance of familiar and…

Arts & Culture
5
The Esoterics

The Esoterics is a Seattle-based vocal ensemble, dedicated to performing and perpetuating contemporary choral music from around the world.

Arts & Culture
6
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
7
Oregon Music Festival

Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.

Arts & Culture
8
Foundation for Modern Opera
—
9
Tacoma Opera Association Professional Services

The mission of Tacoma opera is to inspire, educate, and uplift our audiences in the puget sound region by presenting productions of high artistic quality using a combination of your emgerging artists, established local professionals and…

Arts & Culture
10
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

—
11
Bellingham Festival of Music

To provide world class orchestra & chamber music concerts, master classes, educational rehearsals and other music education opportunities, and pre-concert lectures for audiences in the Pacific Northwest at an affordable price and/or for…

Arts & Culture
12
Pacific Chamber Orchestra

PCO is a regional professionalensemble dedicated to sustaining and extending the rich heritage of classical music through inspiring performances and engaging educational programs designed to enrich our local communities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Record Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is E B Dunn Historic Garden Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northwest Opera in Schools Etcetera: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwest Opera in Schools EtceteraTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL+1 more: $200 · Arts & CulturePROJECT OPPORTUNITY: $1,500 · OtherPROJECT OPPORTUNITYHOLY APOSTLES: $1,000 · OtherHOLY APOSTLESMONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL MICHAEL: $750 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL…Individual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF BRETHREN: $500 · OtherCHURCH OF BRETHRENHOLY APOSTLES ORTHODOX CHURCH: $500 · OtherHOLY APOSTLES ORTHODOX CHURCHSEATTLE SYMPHONY: $250 · Other+1 more: $100 · OtherANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR: $1,250 · AnimalsFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $1,150 · Housing & ShelterINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $750 · InternationalE B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUST: $500 · PhilanthropyCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC: $250 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$9,200Other$5,100Animals$1,250Housing & Shelter$1,150International$750Philanthropy$500Human Services$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL: $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetE B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC MUSICWORKS: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John J and Georgiana Theodore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John J and Georgiana Theodore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John J and Georgiana Theodore’s filings →

More from the funding graph