Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John J and Georgiana Theodore Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$500
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Arts & Culture$9kReligion$2kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$1kInternational$750Philanthropy$500Public Safety & Disaster$500Human Services$250Other$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES$500
ANIMAL PROTECTIVE SOCIETY FRIDAY HARBOR$500
CHURCH OF BRETHREN$500
MONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL MICHAEL$500
SEATTLE SYMPHONY$250
PACIFIC MUSIC WORKS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$14k · 7 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$14k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+75%

Still filing today

71%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $950 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    Northwest Opera in Schools Etcetera
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k
  • TP
    THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +23%
  • PO
    PROJECT OPPORTUNITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k

Funded once

  • HA
    HOLY APOSTLES
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • EB
    E B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUSTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orchestra Seattle - Seattle Chamber Singer

The mission of Orchestra Seattle | Seattle Chamber Singers is to enrich the quality of life in the Pacific Northwest through performance of great orchestral and choral literature; to introduce Northwest audiences to rarely heard works of…

2
Philharmonia Northwest

Philharmonia Northwest contributes to the vitality of the classical music community in the Pacific Northwest by presenting professional concerts highlighting the diverse past and present repertoire for chamber orchestra. It is also…

Arts & Culture
3
Portland Baroque Orchestra

Pbo creates transformative experiences for musicians and listeners who share in the exploration and celebration of historically inspired music. the professional orchestra presents world-class performances on period instruments for up to…

Arts & Culture
4
Camerata Pacifica

Camerata Pacifica's mission is to affect positively how people experience live performances of classical music. The Organization will engage our audience intellectually and emotionally by presenting the finest performance of familiar and…

Arts & Culture
5
The Esoterics

The Esoterics is a Seattle-based vocal ensemble, dedicated to performing and perpetuating contemporary choral music from around the world.

Arts & Culture
6
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
7
Oregon Music Festival

Oregon Music Festival's mission is the performance, production, and promotion of classical music through orchestral, choral/orchestra, and chamber music.

Arts & Culture
8
Foundation for Modern Opera
9
Tacoma Opera Association Professional Services

The mission of Tacoma opera is to inspire, educate, and uplift our audiences in the puget sound region by presenting productions of high artistic quality using a combination of your emgerging artists, established local professionals and…

Arts & Culture
10
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

11
Bellingham Festival of Music

To provide world class orchestra & chamber music concerts, master classes, educational rehearsals and other music education opportunities, and pre-concert lectures for audiences in the Pacific Northwest at an affordable price and/or for…

Arts & Culture
12
Pacific Chamber Orchestra

PCO is a regional professionalensemble dedicated to sustaining and extending the rich heritage of classical music through inspiring performances and engaging educational programs designed to enrich our local communities.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Record Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is E B Dunn Historic Garden Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Northwest Opera in Schools Etcetera — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNorthwest Opera in Schools EtceteraTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL+1 more — $200 · Arts & CulturePROJECT OPPORTUNITY — $1,500 · OtherPROJECT OPPORTUNITYHOLY APOSTLES — $1,000 · OtherHOLY APOSTLESMONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL MICHAEL — $750 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE HOLY ARCHANGEL…Individual grant recipient — $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHURCH OF BRETHREN — $500 · OtherCHURCH OF BRETHRENHOLY APOSTLES ORTHODOX CHURCH — $500 · OtherHOLY APOSTLES ORTHODOX CHURCHSEATTLE SYMPHONY — $250 · Other+1 more — $100 · OtherANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR — $1,250 · AnimalsFOSS HOME & VILLAGE — $1,150 · Housing & ShelterINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $750 · InternationalE B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUST — $500 · PhilanthropyCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC — $250 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$9,200Other$5,100Animals$1,250Housing & Shelter$1,150International$750Philanthropy$500Human Services$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $4,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION SOCIETY OF FRIDAY HARBOR — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOSS HOME & VILLAGE — $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetE B DUNN HISTORIC GARDEN TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC MUSICWORKS — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John J and Georgiana Theodore Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph