Skip to content
John I Smith Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

John I Smith Charities Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$3.9MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.4MReligion$903kArts & Culture$771kHousing & Shelter$760kYouth Development$380kFood & Nutrition$272kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $632k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $600k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENDLETON PLACE INC$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION$50,000
FURMAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
DAVIDSON COLLEGE$50,000
MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN$50,000
UNITED MINISTRIES$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS UPSTATE$50,000
PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE$50,000
HERITAGE INSTITUTE$50,000
SC GOVERNORS SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS & HUMANITIES FOUNDATION INC$40,000
THORNWELL$40,000
YMCA OF GREENVILLE$30,000
LEAD COLLECTIVE$30,000
LEGACY EARLY COLLEGE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THORNWELL: $50k → 18%THORNWELL: $50k → 18%THORNWELL: $50k → 18%THORNWELL: $40k → 18%THORNWELL: $30k → 18%THORNWELL: $25k → 18%SENIOR ACTION: $50k → 10%SENIOR ACTION: $25k → 10%SENIOR ACTION INC: $20k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $80k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $50k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $40k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $40k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $32k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $30k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $25k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $25k → 10%GREER RELIEF: $25k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $25k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $20k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $20k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $20k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $15k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 10%GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $10k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $130k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE INC: $100k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $75k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $30k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $25k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $25k → 10%YMCA GREENVILLE: $25k → 10%PENDLETON PLACE: $25k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $25k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $15k → 10%YMCA GREENVILLE: $15k → 10%YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $15k → 10%FOSTERING GREAT IDEAS: $15k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 70 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

70 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
33

Total granted

$10M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+26%

Still filing today

70%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $720k · revenue +5%
  • FU
    FURMAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $625k · revenue +26%
  • Davidson College
    5× · 2018–2025 · $541k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RILEY INSTITUTE AT FURMAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • S
    SOTERIA
    one grant, 2019 · $75k
  • CI
    COMMUNITYWORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Greenville Area Development Corporation

Promoting and enhancing the economic growth and development of greenville county south carolina; gadc was formed by greenville county council.

Community Improvement
3
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
4
Greenwood Community Theatre Inc

Greenwood community theatre aspires to enrich the community by creating and fostering professionalism and diversity in all its theatrical endeavors and experiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Foundation for a Greater Greenwood County Inc

Providing leadership to enhance the quality of life in greenwood through strategic long-term vision and collaborative community development initiatives.

Philanthropy
6
Greenville Theatre Arts Center
—
7
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
8
South Carolina Council On Competitiveness

The south carolina council on competitiveness is a nonpartisan, business-led non-profit organization committed to advancing the long term competitiveness of south carolina through actionable research, support of industry clusters and…

Community Improvement
9
Goodwill Industries of the Southern Piedmont Inc

Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…

Employment
10
Greenville Classical Academy

Provide a distinctly Christ-centered, biblical and classical education producing students who glorify God in their thoughts, words and deeds.

Education
11
Granville Health Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in charitable efforts and to support granville health system in providing healthcare and related services to the citizens and residents of granville county and the surrounding community.

Health
12
Green Hill Center for North Carolina Art

The mission of green hill center for nc art is to promote the visual arts of north carolina by engaging a broad community of artists, adults and children through dynamic exhibitions and educational programs while providing a platform for…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greer Community Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Favor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/72
Grantees still filing
52/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $520,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDAVIDSON UNIVERSITY: $395,000 · OtherDAVIDSON UNIVERSITYCOLUMBIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $250,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARYA Child's Haven Inc: $215,000 · OtherMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $210,000 · OtherFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $160,000 · Other+59 more: $2,908,500 · Other+59 moreFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $625,000 · EducationFURMAN UNIVERSITYDavidson College: $541,100 · EducationDavidson CollegeGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $535,000 · EducationGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATI…PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY: $470,000 · EducationPUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNER…CREATIVE ADVANCEMENT CENTERS INC: $115,000 · EducationGREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $95,000 · Education+4 more: $120,000 · EducationPENDLETON PLACE INC: $330,000 · Human ServicesPENDLETON PLACE IN…THORNWELL: $245,000 · Human ServicesTHORNWELLGREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesGREER RELIEF AND R…YMCA OF GREENVILLE: $195,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREENVILLEGREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $187,000 · Human ServicesGREER COMMUNITY MI…CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $155,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DEVELOP…GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesGREER COMMUNITY OU…MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR ACTION INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC: $80,000 · Human Services+7 more: $182,000 · Human Services+7 morePRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $720,000 · Housing & ShelterPRESBYTER…HOMES OF HOPE INC: $115,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMES OF …COMMUNITYWORKS INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY…+1 more: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $171,000 · Arts & CultureETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $155,000 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $65,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $35,000 · Arts & CultureGREENVILLE CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTAYLORS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $225,000 · HealthPrisma Health-Upstate: $210,000 · HealthHERITAGE INSTITUTE: $50,000 · HealthSOUTH CAROLINA INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH: $30,000 · HealthSERVANTS FOR SIGHT: $20,000 · HealthWILD HEARTS EQUINE THERAPY CENTER: $19,000 · HealthUNITED MINISTRIES: $215,000 · ReligionMERE CHRISTIANITY FORUM INC: $60,000 · Religion
Other$4,658,500Education$2,501,100Human Services$1,919,000Housing & Shelter$935,000Arts & Culture$616,000Health$554,000Religion$275,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $720,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFURMAN UNIVERSITY: $625,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDavidson College: $541,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC: $535,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetPUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY: $470,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetPENDLETON PLACE INC: $330,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetTHORNWELL: $245,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTAYLORS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $225,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED MINISTRIES: $215,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc: $215,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetGREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC: $210,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $210,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPrisma Health-Upstate: $210,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF GREENVILLE: $195,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $187,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetPEACE CENTER FOUNDATION: $171,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $160,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc: $155,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $155,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetGREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $145,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE INC: $115,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCREATIVE ADVANCEMENT CENTERS INC: $115,000 over 6y, 38% of budgetST ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL: $100,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $95,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION: $95,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetSENIOR ACTION INC: $95,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUPSTATE MEDIATION CENTER: $93,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC: $85,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC: $80,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetLEAD COLLECTIVE INCCHA: $70,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGREENVILLE SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CANCER CONNECTION: $67,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $65,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $65,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMERE CHRISTIANITY FORUM INC: $60,000 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetJASMINE ROAD INC: $52,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetTRIUNE MERCY CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNICHOLTOWN CHILD AND FAMILY COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetLEGACY EARLY COLLEGE: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY ADVANCEMENT: $45,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetDAILY BREAD MINISTRIES INC: $45,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetSC GOVERNOR'S SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FURMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Davidson College ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THORNWELL ↗
  • Who funds TAYLORS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds GREER COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC ↗
  • Who funds ETV Endowment of South Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GREER COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMES OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE ADVANCEMENT CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ANDREWS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE LITERACY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE MEDIATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationScsymmes FoundationDaniel-Mickel Foundat…Scansource Charitable…United Way of Greenvi…Hollingsworth Funds I…Bill and Connie Timmo…Dabo's All in Team Fo…Charles Timmons Found…Sisters of Charity Fo…W W Burgiss Charities…Yeargin Foundation
The Jolley FoundationNV90.3× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · Scansource Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · Bill and Connie Timmons Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Charles Timmons Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · W W Burgiss Charities Inc · Yeargin Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John I Smith Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John I Smith Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John I Smith Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to John I Smith Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John I Smith Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home