Skip to content

· Private foundation

John H Watson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$3.6MReligion$1.1MPhilanthropy$511kPublic Benefit$489kArts & Culture$450kHuman Services$223kHealth$192kCrime & Legal$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $291k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $272k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$33M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$1,011,000
EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$147,000
ALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION$125,000
VARIOUS OTHER TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS (CONTRIBUTIONS OF 2500 OR LESS)$31,850
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$30,000
VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL$25,500
WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP$25,000
ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR DEAF AND BLIND$20,000
FRIENDS OF ARMY AVIATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION$20,000
CHRYSALIS A HOME FOR GIRLS$20,000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF AL$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OZARK$12,000
ACTS CHURCH CHRISTIAN CENTER$11,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $20k → 18%DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20k → 12%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $10k → 18%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $10k → 18%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $10k → 18%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $5k → 18%ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $5k → 18%CHRYSALIS A HOME FOR GIRLS: $20k → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 31 repeat orgs$985k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
26

Total granted

$6.3M
$933k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +57%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $63k · revenue +16%
  • VB
    VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD
    3× · 2021–2025 · $61k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • WU
    WIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $165k · revenue -5%
  • 1N
    1819 NEWS LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Broadcasters Association

The alabama broadcasters association (the association) is the official voice of the broadcasting industry in alabama. we are dedicated to protecting and enhancing broadcasting, and promoting the professional status of our members.the aba…

—
2
Wiregrass Pet Rescue & Adoption Center Inc

The wiregrass pet rescue and adoption center is dedicated to creating an exemplary animal shelter and pet adoption and community friendly facility in dothan/houston county, alabama. wprac will provide for the basic needs for domesticated…

Animals
3
West Alabama Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a child-focused approach to the intervention, treatment, prevention, and prosecution of child abuse cases. to provide free therapy to child abuse victims and age appropriate awareness in our school systems.

Human Services
4
Wiregrass Museum of Art Inc

Operation of a public art museum

Arts & Culture
5
West Alabama Action Group Inc
Community Improvement
6
Alabama Broadcasters Association Educational Foundation
Education
7
Alabama Partnership for Children

To work in partnership with families and organizations to ensure that all alabama children (birth to five) get everything they need to develop to their fullest potential.

Education
8
Voices for Alabama's Children

Our mission is to speak for the well-being of Alabama's children through research, public awareness, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
9
Alabama Alliance Network

The alabama alliance netowrk works to strengthen and enhance alabama's civic society through research, education, and grantmaking

Public Benefit
10
Southeast Alabama Child Advocacy Center

Established to serve as an advocate of children & to reduce the trauma & anxiety of victims of child abuse by providing coordinated multi- disciplinary & human approach to the investigation & interviewing process.

Human Services
11
Wings Across Alabama

To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.

Education
12
West Alabama Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to help alleviate hunger and food insecurity in west alabama.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Policy Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alabama Pro-Life Coalition Education Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $3,012,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1,127,000 · OtherEVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $390,000 · OtherALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INCPROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER TAX-EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS (CONTRIBUTIONS OF 2500 OR LESS): $228,500 · Other+41 more: $1,328,350 · Other+41 moreALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $165,000 · PhilanthropyALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $60,000 · Human ServicesTHE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesCHRYSALIS A HOME FOR GIRLS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesDOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,500 · Human ServicesVIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD: $60,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $27,500 · HealthThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $11,000 · HealthSMILE-A-MILE: $4,000 · HealthJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,500 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $11,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public BenefitDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $34,500 · Environment
Other$6,585,850Arts & Culture$255,000Philanthropy$165,000Human Services$128,500Health$103,000Public Benefit$52,500Environment$34,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $390,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetWIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC: $165,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST EDUCATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC: $80,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $62,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetVIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD: $60,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $60,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetTHE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $34,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $31,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $26,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS INC OF DOTHAN: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHRYSALIS A HOME FOR GIRLS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALABAMA PRO-LIFE COALITION EDUCATION FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetLeadership Institute: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK 211 INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOTHAN RESCUE MISSION INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOZARK HERITAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ALABAMA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWIREGRASS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VIVIAN B ADAMS SCHOOL BOARD ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds OZARK DALE COUNTY LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC OF DOTHAN ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS A HOME FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA PRO-LIFE COALITION EDUCATION FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Paul & Barbara Flowers FoundationAL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Paul & Barbara Flowers Foundation · Wiregrass Foundation · The George & Laura Flowers Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Robert and Carol Flowers Foundation · Newton Family Foundation Inc · Dove Family Foundation · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · Smurfit Westrock US Foundation F/K/A Westrock Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John H Watson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John H Watson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John H Watson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John H Watson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John H Watson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph