How much did JOHN C & CATHERINE S ANGLE grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 81% of JOHN C & CATHERINE S ANGLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

museumarts

2023

arts

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k6 grants · $110k
$50k–250k2 grants · $100k

$26,250

Median grant

States reached

$5.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

LINCOLN PARKS FOUNDATION$50,000
NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT$50,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$30,000
LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS$26,250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEBRASKA$15,000
NEBRASKA PUBLIC MEDIA$15,000
LINCOLN ARTS COUNCIL$13,750
NEBRASKA HUMANITIES$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$865k · 7 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$865k

$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%

+49%

Still filing today

57%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
6× · 2019–2024 · $230k · revenue +11%
NC
NEBRASKA CULTURAL ENDOWMENT
4× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +145%
LC
LUX CENTER FOR THE ARTS
4× · 2020–2024 · $66k · revenue +20%

Funded once

NT
NEBRASKA TRAILS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -80%
TN
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
one grant, 2023 · $30k
RM
RABBLE MILLgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +1036%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lincoln Area Chamber of Commerce

To Market Lincoln as the area of choice in which to live and do business, by attracting, assisting, retaining and promoting our members

—

Lincoln County Community

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy

Nebraska Art Association

Through stewardship of our collection and financial resources, the sheldon art association supports the sheldon museum of arts mission to inspire inquiry and discovery, serving the university of nebraska, the state, and beyond.

Arts & Culture

Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—

Lincoln Community Foundation

To Cultivate Lincoln Philanthropy and Stewardship for Today and Tomorrow

Philanthropy

Nebraska Humanities Council

Humanities nebraska helps nebraskans explore what connects us and makes us human.

—

Lincoln Land Community College

Cultivate and steward charitable gifts to enrich and support llcc students, programs and services.

Philanthropy

Lincoln Parks and Recreation Foundation

To inspire and nurture a philanthropic legacy for parks and recreation in our community.

Recreation & Sports

The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

Acquiring, holding and maintaining conservation easements in nebraska land

Environment

Foundry Community Foundation

The foundry is a collaborative resource in downtown lincoln to support, educate, and develop the nebraska purpose driven community

Community Improvement

Community Action of Nebraska Inc

To alleviate poverty and build the capacity of nebraska's community action agencies.

Community Improvement

Kansas City Artists Coalition

The kansas city artists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness in kansas city and the surrounding region, and supports the professional growth of artists

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Cultural Endowment and the most unlike its peers is Community Action Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

8/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$833,250Philanthropy$95,000Arts & Culture$67,750Recreation & Sports$25,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

D F Dillon FoundationNE20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: D F Dillon Foundation · Abel Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Cooper Foundation · Dolezal Family Foundation · Pegler Family Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Lee and Debbie Stuart Family Foundation · Duncan Family Trust · Assurity Life Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JOHN C & CATHERINE S ANGLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DOWNTOWN LINCOLN FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~2039 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 363774978 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DOWNTOWN LINCOLN FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 2039 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to John C & Catherine S Angle?

Find your warmest path to John C & Catherine S Angle through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JOHN C & CATHERINE S ANGLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John C & Catherine S Angle?

More from the funding graph

JOHN C & CATHERINE S ANGLE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to John C & Catherine S Angle?

More from the funding graph