Skip to content

· Private foundation

John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2019
34
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Religion$225kEducation$112kHuman Services$32kHealth$11kYouth Development$3kArts & Culture$3kScience & Tech$2kEnvironment$500Other$0
02FY2019 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k32 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holland Christian School$32,000
LaGrave Christian Reformed Church$25,000
Holland Home$3,000
Cru$2,500
Calvin College$2,100
Calvin Theological Seminary$2,000
Hope College$2,000
the potter's house$2,000
Western Theological Seminary$2,000
Pine Rest Foundation$2,000
Kuyper College$2,000
Friendship Ministries$1,000
Geneva camp and retreat center$1,000
Northwood University$1,000
Wedgewood Christian Services$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%evergreen commons: $1k → 10%EVERGREEN COMMONS: $1k → 10%WEDGEWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $1k → 11%Wedgewood Christian Services: $1k → 11%HOLLAND HOME: $13k → 11%Holland Home: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$364k · 24 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$364k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-1%

Still filing today

63%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPE COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2019 · $54k · revenue +37%
  • HH
    Holland Home
    2× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +43%
  • TP
    The Potters House
    2× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRIDGEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • HD
    HELEN DEVOS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • SM
    SAINT MARY'S FOUNDATION - ALS CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
3
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
4
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
5
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education
6
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Welch College

Welch college is a christian higher education institution that educates leaders to serve christ, his church, and his world through biblical thought and life

Education
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holland Home; the most unlike its peers is Roosevelt Park Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAGRAVE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $146,500 · OtherLAGRAVE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCHTHE WESTERN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA: $54,000 · OtherTHE WESTERN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICAHolland Christian School: $33,500 · OtherHolland Christian SchoolBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $11,000 · Other+29 more: $35,150 · Other+29 moreHOPE COLLEGE: $54,000 · EducationHOPE COLLEGEThe Potters House: $13,000 · EducationThe Potters HouseCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $4,100 · EducationCALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $4,000 · EducationKUYPER COLLEGE: $4,000 · Education+1 more: $2,000 · EducationHolland Home: $16,000 · Human ServicesPINE REST FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesEVERGREEN COMMONS: $2,000 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2,000 · Human ServicesGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $3,000 · ReligionVAN ANDEL INSTITUTE: $2,000 · PhilanthropyGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthFaith Hospice: $500 · HealthTHE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$280,150Education$81,100Human Services$23,000Religion$3,000Philanthropy$2,500Health$1,750Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $54,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHolland Home: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $4,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKUYPER COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINE REST FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPLAIN SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetEVERGREEN COMMONS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwood University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLand Conservancy of West Michigan: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Holland Home ↗
  • Who funds The Potters House ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds KUYPER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PINE REST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHAPLAIN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN COMMONS ↗
  • Who funds Northwood University ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Faith Hospice ↗
  • Who funds ROOSEVELT PARK MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edgar and Elsa Prince FoundationMI32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · The Richard and Helen Devos Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Dick and Betsy Devos Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John Bouma Sr and Sharon K Bouma’s filings →

    More from the funding graph