Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John B Rust Charity Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$130kHealth$96kHousing & Shelter$84kCrime & Legal$30kEducation$28kYouth Development$20kCommunity Improvement$17kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAPPYBOTTOMS$35,000
HILLCREST MINISTRIES$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEAD TO READ INC: $7k → 8%LIFE UNLIMITED INC: $52k → 8%HAPPYBOTTOMS: $35k → 15%HAPPYBOTTOMS: $24k → 15%GRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

2
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
3
Refuge Kc Inc

We exist to welcome our new-American neighbors with Gospel-focused ministries of mercy so they might know, love, and follow Jesus into His Kingdom

Religion
4
Front Porch Alliance - Kansas City Inc

Front Porch Alliance works together with residents of Kansas City, Missouris eastside and urban core to meet their changing needs at home and in school.

Community Improvement
5
Housing Services of Kansas City Inc

The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Action Inc

Helping people move from poverty towards prosperity.

Human Services
7
Brain Injury Assn of Ks & Greater Kc

To provide ongoing brain injury advocacy, education and resources

Health
8
Interfaith Housing and Community Service

To assist low-income homeowners of south central kansas to repair/rehabilitate their homes; to assist qualified low-income residents of south central kansas to purchase homes or to build low-cost homes for these residents; and to provide…

Community Improvement
9
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
10
Kansas City Community Land Trust

Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.

Housing & Shelter
11
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc

To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.

Religion
12
Hope Faith Ministries Inc

Hope Faith Ministries Inc. works to alleviate homelessness and poverty in the Kansas City area by providing basic necessities and assistance while also providing critical programs to help empower individ

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grandview Assistance Program and the most unlike its peers is Happybottoms. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAPPYBOTTOMS — $59,000 · Human ServicesHAPPYBOTTOMSLIFE UNLIMITED INC — $52,000 · Human ServicesLIFE UNLIMITED INCGRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $15,000 · Human ServicesGRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAMLEAD TO READ INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY — $25,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITYIndividual grant recipient — $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $16,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMPOWERING THE PARENT TO EMPOWER — $10,000 · OtherEMPOWERING THE PARENT TO EMPOWERAdventHealth Kansas City Foundation — $26,000 · HealthAdventHealth…Welcome House Inc — $17,600 · HealthWelcome Hous…UMKC FOUNDATION — $21,000 · EducationUMKC FOUNDA…BRIGHT FUTURES FUND — $20,000 · EducationBRIGHT FUTU…HILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $39,000 · ReligionHILLCREST …Legal Aid of Western Missouri — $30,000 · Crime & LegalFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$133,000Other$117,500Health$43,600Education$41,000Religion$39,000Crime & Legal$30,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHAPPYBOTTOMS — $59,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLIFE UNLIMITED INC — $52,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHILLCREST MINISTRIES INC — $39,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Missouri — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAdventHealth Kansas City Foundation — $26,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUMKC FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWelcome House Inc — $17,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGRANDVIEW ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · J B Reynolds Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · John W and Effie E Speas Memorial Trust · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · The Kansas City Royals Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John B Rust Charity Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph