Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Marilyn Olson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$188kHealth$89kArts & Culture$83kReligion$80kFood & Nutrition$61kYouth Development$55kCrime & Legal$51kRecreation & Sports$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MONDAK$6,000
RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK$6,000
FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE$5,000
R C EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITION$5,000
ROI FOUNDATION INC$5,000
R C COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE$5,000
PELLA LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$4,000
NORTHEASTERN ARTS NETWORK$4,000
EAGLE FOUNDATION$3,000
MON-DAK HERITAGE CENTER$3,000
FLATHEAD LUTHERAN BIBLE CAMP$3,000
FORT PECK FINE ARTS COUNCIL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $6k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $6k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK: $5k → 10%SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$705k · 48 repeat orgs$158k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -67% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
2

Total granted

$705k
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-67%

Still filing today

48%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +42%
  • RC
    RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +60%
  • RC
    RICHLAND COUNTY COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • TG
    TRUE GENTLEMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · 89% of their budget
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUT TROOP #2433
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Singing Waters Montana

To greatfully steward the land and singing waters with respect and care. To build a beloved community that values justice, equality, and love.

Recreation & Sports
2
Scenic Montana Trails
—
3
Beaverhead Trails Coalition

Enhancement and development of trails on public lands in Beaverhead County

Environment
4
Montana Preservation Alliance Inc

The montana preservation alliance (mpa) saves and protects montana's historic places, traditional landscapes, and cultural heritage. we are the only statewide, not-for-profit organization dedicated to providing montanans with the resources…

—
5
Save our Gallatin Front Inc
Environment
6
Montana Business Leadership Council

The mblc exists to encourage and enact business-friendly policies that create good-paying jobs and make montana a better place to live. the primary purpose of the mblc is to educate the public on important business issues, enable citizens…

Community Improvement
7
Montana State Parks Foundation

The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.

Recreation & Sports
8
Montana Healthcare Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Headwaters Trail System

To build and maintain trails in the Missouri River Headwaters Area.

Environment
10
Red Lodge Fire Rescue Foundation a Montana Nonprofit Public Benefit Corp

To Provide Financial and Other Support to Fire and Emergency Medical Service Organizations and Providers Serving the Greater Red Lodge, Montana Community.

Philanthropy
11
ZooMontana Inc

Our mission is to provide visitors with an engaging, recreational, and educational experience, while ensuring exceptional care for our animal and plant collections and supporting responsible propagation programs for species in need.

Animals
12
North Central Montana Economic Development District

To provide through local leadership economic, technical, and engineering information, and access to resources to improve theeconomies in the area.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bresee Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RICHLAND COUNTY COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $45,000 · OtherRICHLAND COUNTY COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCR C EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITION: $45,000 · OtherR C EMERGENCY SHELTER COALITIONROI FOUNDATION INC: $38,500 · OtherROI FOUNDATION INCSIDNEY SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $34,000 · OtherSIDNEY SOCCER ASSOCIATIONNORTHEASTERN ARTS NETWORK: $32,000 · OtherNORTHEASTERN ARTS NETWORKPELLA LUTHERAN CHURCH: $31,500 · OtherPELLA LUTHERAN CHURCHEAGLE FOUNDATION: $27,000 · OtherUPPER MISSOURI MINISTRIES: $23,000 · OtherMONDAK HERITAGE CENTER: $22,000 · OtherEASTERN MT MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $20,000 · OtherFLATHEAD LUTHERAN BIBLE CAMP: $18,000 · OtherSIDNEY AREA DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $18,000 · Other+30 more: $177,769 · Other+30 moreTRUE GENTLEMAN FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationTRUE GENTLEMAN FOUN…+1 more: $751 · EducationRICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $47,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY: $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE: $34,000 · PhilanthropyVALLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · PhilanthropyFORT PECK FINE ARTS COUNCIL: $14,000 · Arts & CultureBIGFORK CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION LTD: $7,500 · Arts & CultureSIDNEY GYMNASTICS CLUB: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $4,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$531,769Education$150,751Human Services$57,000Youth Development$48,000Philanthropy$48,000Arts & Culture$21,500Recreation & Sports$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUE GENTLEMAN FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY: $48,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $47,000 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC: $45,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetROI FOUNDATION INC: $38,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE: $34,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMONDAK HERITAGE CENTER: $22,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetEASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIDNEY GYMNASTICS CLUB: $15,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetFORT PECK FINE ARTS COUNCIL: $14,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetVALLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetSUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $10,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetFLATHEAD LAKERS INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetIntermountain Deaconess Childrens Services: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBIGFORK CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION LTD: $7,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY: $7,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe LifeGuard Group Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSIDNEY FIRE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetGLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Land Water Access Association: $4,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE THE MAAH DAAH HEY: $3,504 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMONTANA COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $3,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMONTANAS OUTDOOR LEGACY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEMMAUS HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $751 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUE GENTLEMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF RICHLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds RICHLAND COUNTY COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY CARE ↗
  • Who funds MONDAK HERITAGE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN MONTANA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SIDNEY GYMNASTICS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FORT PECK FINE ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNRISE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD LAKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Deaconess Childrens Services ↗
  • Who funds BIGFORK CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY ↗
  • Who funds The LifeGuard Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIDNEY FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLACIER NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT21.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Oneok Foundation Inc · Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dayton Foundation · Foundation for Community Care · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Marilyn Olson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Marilyn Olson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John & Marilyn Olson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John & Marilyn Olson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Marilyn Olson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph