Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Cree Marshall Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$156kPublic Benefit$66kCrime & Legal$45kCivil Rights$38kInternational$18kRecreation & Sports$7kArts & Culture$7kSocial Science$2k
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Legal & Policy Center$8,000
Young America's Foundation$8,000
EdChoice$8,000
Turning Point USA$8,000
Fund for American Studies$5,000
Foundation for Economic Education$5,000
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation$4,000
The Leadership Institute$4,000
Opportunity International$2,000
Heritage Foundation$2,000
Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women$2,000
Intercollegiate Studies Institute$2,000
Citizens Against Government Waste$2,000
Institute for Humane Studies$2,000
George Mason University Foundation$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Turning Point USA: $8k → 11%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%Foundation for Economic Education: $5k → 9%Judical Watch: $4k → 14%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $5k → 15%EdChoice: $8k → 16%OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 7%National Legal & Policy Center: $8k → 4%Young America's Foundation: $8k → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $6k → 7%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INST: $4k → 10%Foundation for Economic Education: $3k → 9%Judical Watch: $3k → 14%EdChoice: $6k → 16%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%National Legal & Policy Center: $3k → 4%Young America's Foundation: $8k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $6k → 7%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%Foundation for Economic Education: $3k → 9%Judical Watch: $3k → 14%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $6k → 7%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%Young America's Foundation: $6k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $5k → 14%Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women: $5k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%Young America's Foundation: $4k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%Clare Booth Luce Policy: $4k → 6%INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE STUDIES: $4k → 7%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $4k → 14%Clare Boothe Luce Policy: $4k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%CLARE BOOTH LUCE POLICY: $4k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Citizens Against Government Waste: $4k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
MO
VA
DE
AZ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$277k · 23 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$277k
$27k

Still filing today

74%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
EducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitInternationalYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    5× · 2017–2023 · $32k · revenue +67%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    5× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +3%
  • NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • NR
    NAT'L RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEF FD
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • CB
    Clare Boothe Luce Policy
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
2
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

—
3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
8
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
9
The Institute of World Politics

The institute of world politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on…

International
10
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young America's Foundation: $32,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $21,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESInstitute for Humane Studies: $18,000 · OtherInstitute for Humane StudiesFoundation for Economic Education: $14,000 · OtherFoundation for Economic EducationCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $12,000 · OtherCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTEMilton & Rose Friedman Foundation: $10,000 · OtherMilton & Rose Friedman FoundationHeritage Foundation: $10,000 · OtherHeritage FoundationNational Right to Work Legal Defense Fund: $9,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC: $9,000 · OtherClare Booth Luce Policy: $8,000 · OtherFRIEDMAN FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherNAT'L RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEF FD: $6,000 · OtherDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $6,000 · Other+7 more: $18,000 · Other+7 moreINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE ST…GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVE…EdChoice Inc: $14,000 · EducationEdChoice IncHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGELeadership Institute: $26,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Ins…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $13,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH…CATO INSTITUTE: $3,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTENATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $20,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL L…NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL R…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $18,000 · InternationalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $7,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $2,000 · Social Science
Other$179,000Education$54,000Public Benefit$42,000Crime & Legal$30,000International$18,000Youth Development$7,000Arts & Culture$7,000Social Science$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYoung America's Foundation: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $20,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Cree Marshall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Cree Marshall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Cree Marshall Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Cree Marshall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Cree Marshall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph