Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John and Cree Marshall Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$156kPublic Benefit$66kCrime & Legal$45kCivil Rights$38kInternational$18kRecreation & Sports$7kArts & Culture$7kSocial Science$2k
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EdChoice$8,000
Turning Point USA$8,000
National Legal & Policy Center$8,000
Young America's Foundation$8,000
Fund for American Studies$5,000
Foundation for Economic Education$5,000
National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation$4,000
The Leadership Institute$4,000
Intercollegiate Studies Institute$2,000
George Mason University Foundation$2,000
Citizens Against Government Waste$2,000
Heritage Foundation$2,000
Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women$2,000
Opportunity International$2,000
Institute for Humane Studies$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 45% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Turning Point USA: $8k → 11%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%Foundation for Economic Education: $5k → 9%Judical Watch: $4k → 14%Fellowship of Christian Athletes: $5k → 15%EdChoice: $8k → 16%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%National Legal & Policy Center: $8k → 4%Young America's Foundation: $8k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $6k → 7%INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INST: $4k → 10%Foundation for Economic Education: $3k → 9%Judical Watch: $3k → 14%EdChoice: $6k → 16%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%NATIONAL LEGAL & POLICY CENTER: $3k → 4%Young America's Foundation: $8k → 6%THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $6k → 7%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR ECON EDUCATION: $3k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $3k → 14%Opportunity International: $4k → 7%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $6k → 7%Intercollegiate Studies Institute: $4k → 10%OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 7%Young America's Foundation: $6k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $5k → 14%Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women: $5k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%CLARE BOOTH LUCE POLICY: $4k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%Clare Boothe Luce Policy: $4k → 6%Institute for Humane Studies: $4k → 7%Fund for American Studies: $4k → 14%Young America's Foundation: $4k → 6%The Leadership Institute: $4k → 7%FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES: $4k → 14%Clare Booth Luce Policy: $4k → 6%INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE STUDIES: $4k → 7%Citizens Against Government Waste: $4k → 14%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%George Mason University Foundation: $4k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
MO
VA
DE
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$277k · 23 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
7

Total granted

$277k
$27k

Still filing today

74%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23
EducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitInternationalYouth DevelopmentSocial ScienceOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    5× · 2017–2023 · $32k · revenue +67%
  • TF
    THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
    5× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +3%
  • NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER
    5× · 2017–2023 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • NR
    NAT'L RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEF FD
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • GM
    GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
2
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

3
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
8
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
9
The Institute of World Politics

The institute of world politics is a graduate school of national security and international affairs, dedicated to developing leaders with a sound understanding of international realities and the ethical conduct of statecraft, based on…

International
10
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
11
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
12
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Intercollegiate Studies Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Young America's Foundation — $32,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $21,000 · OtherTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIESInstitute for Humane Studies — $18,000 · OtherInstitute for Humane StudiesFoundation for Economic Education — $14,000 · OtherFoundation for Economic EducationCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE — $12,000 · OtherCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTEMilton & Rose Friedman Foundation — $10,000 · OtherMilton & Rose Friedman FoundationHeritage Foundation — $10,000 · OtherHeritage FoundationNational Right to Work Legal Defense Fund — $9,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INC — $9,000 · OtherClare Booth Luce Policy — $8,000 · OtherFRIEDMAN FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER — $6,000 · OtherNAT'L RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEF FD — $6,000 · Other+7 more — $18,000 · Other+7 moreINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $18,000 · EducationINTERCOLLEGIATE ST…EdChoice Inc — $14,000 · EducationEdChoice IncGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · EducationGEORGE MASON UNIVE…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $8,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGELeadership Institute — $26,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Ins…JUDICIAL WATCH INC — $13,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH…CATO INSTITUTE — $3,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTENATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $20,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL L…NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL R…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $18,000 · InternationalCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN — $7,000 · Arts & CultureFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $2,000 · Social Science
Other$179,000Education$54,000Public Benefit$42,000Crime & Legal$30,000International$18,000Arts & Culture$7,000Youth Development$7,000Social Science$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYoung America's Foundation — $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $26,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES — $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER — $20,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies — $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC — $18,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE — $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds THE FUND FOR AMERICAN STUDIES
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies
  • Who funds INTERCOLLEGIATE STUDIES INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
  • Who funds EdChoice Inc
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John and Cree Marshall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Cree Marshall Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Cree Marshall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph