Skip to content

· Private foundation

John & Barbara Knapp Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$43kEducation$26kArts & Culture$9kReligion$8kHuman Services$7kYouth Development$3kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$140k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA$5,000
CAMP WAPSIE CAMPAIGN$2,000
ALL SAINTS CHURCH$1,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$1,000
WAYPOINT$1,000
IOWA PARROT RESCUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $1k → 11%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%WAYPOINT: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 8 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$87k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+36%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WAYPOINT SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +21%
  • OI
    ORCHESTRA IOWA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +12%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • NC
    Northwest Community Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +36%
  • BI
    BRUCEMORE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +181%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of North Central Iowa

Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…

Philanthropy
2
Iowa Medical Society

Our mission is to advance the practice of medicine through advocacy, education, and engagement with physicians throughout iowa to ensure the highest quality of care for the patients they serve.

—
3
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
4
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
5
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
6
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association

To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…

Community Improvement
7
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
8
Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa

The independent insurance agents of iowa will be an unrelenting advocate of the business, professional and political interests of its members; doing so by working in the public's interest and with the highest ethical standards.

—
9
State University of Iowa Foundation

The university of iowa center for advancement's mission is to advance the university of iowa through engagement and philanthropy. we serve our alumni and friends in the state and the region, throughout the country, and around the world. we…

Education
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
12
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of East Central Iowa; the most unlike its peers is Iowa Parrot Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $43,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWAMOUNT MERCY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $16,000 · OtherMOUNT MERCY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONALL SAINTS CHURCH CEDAR RAPIDS IOWA: $7,600 · OtherALL SAINTS CHURCH CEDAR RAPIDS IOWALAWRENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATIONCAMP WAPSIE CAMPAIGN: $2,000 · OtherORCHESTRA IOWA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $1,750 · OtherWAYPOINT SERVICES: $6,000 · Human ServicesValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $1,000 · Human ServicesORCHESTRA IOWA INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureBRUCEMORE INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC: $2,750 · Youth DevelopmentNorthwest Community Hospital: $2,500 · HealthIOWA PARROT RESCUE: $500 · Animals
Philanthropy$43,000Other$37,850Human Services$7,000Arts & Culture$6,500Youth Development$2,750Health$2,500Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $43,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWAYPOINT SERVICES: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORCHESTRA IOWA INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC: $2,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRUCEMORE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds WAYPOINT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ORCHESTRA IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Community Hospital ↗
  • Who funds BRUCEMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
  • Who funds IOWA PARROT RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The McIntyre Foundation · The Hall-Perrine Foundation · United Fire Group Foundation · Rohde Family Charitable Foundation · Mercy Medical Center · John P & Lawrence J Giacoletto Fnd · Lavern T Busse & Audrey Busse Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John & Barbara Knapp Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John & Barbara Knapp Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John & Barbara Knapp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph