Skip to content
John a Reddington Scholarship Fund Xxxx7366 at a glance

· Private foundation

John a Reddington Scholarship Fund Xxxx7366

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$222kReligion$20kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$865
Median grant
4
States reached
$553k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL$8,120
OUR LADY OF MERCY$2,730
THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH$2,650
ST AMBROSE ACADEMY$1,785
ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY$1,700
MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE$1,700
SWARTHMORE COLLEGE$1,700
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$1,700
NATIVITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY OF ROCH$1,435
ST LAWRENCE SCHOOL$920
HOLY CROSS SCHOOL$920
SETON CATHOLIC SCHOOL$865
Individual grant recipient$595
ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY$460
ST FRANCIS de SALES & ST STEPHEN SCHL$460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $2k → 10%ST FRANCIS de SALES & ST STEPHEN SCHL: $2k → 10%ST JOSEPH - AUBURN: $2k → 13%ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%SUNY BINGHAMTON: $4k → 20%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $2k → 14%MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE: $5k → 19%SWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $2k → 10%ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%SUNY BINGHAMTON: $2k → 20%MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE: $4k → 19%MARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE: $2k → 19%OUR LADY OF MERCY: $5k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY: $4k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY: $4k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY: $3k → 14%OUR LADY OF MERCY: $3k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $3k → 14%NAZARETH ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $3k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $3k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $2k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $2k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $2k → 14%NAZARETH ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $2k → 14%THE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $2k → 14%NAZARETH ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $2k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $4k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 14%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $4k → 14%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $3k → 14%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $3k → 14%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $2k → 14%ST AMBROSE ACADEMY: $2k → 14%ST AMBROSE ACADEMY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNY: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNY: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNY: $3k → 14%UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNY: $2k → 14%McQUAID JESUIT HS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CO
MD
SC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 47 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
3

Total granted

$242k
$1k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    4× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +65%
  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $13k · revenue +23%
  • SWARTHMORE COLLEGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • MC
    MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $225
  • SC
    SUNY COLLEGE AT FREDONIA
    one grant, 2022 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
9
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
10
Randolph College Inc

See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o

Education
11
Regis College

Regis college, through education in the arts, sciences, and professions empowers women and men to challenge themselves academically, to serve and to lead. a catholic college, regis is a diverse and welcoming community guided by the values…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Regis University; the most unlike its peers is Tyburn Academy of Mary Immaculate Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOL: $33,448 · OtherBISHOP KEARNEY HIGH SCHOOLOUR LADY OF MERCY: $19,950 · OtherOUR LADY OF MERCYUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNY: $18,950 · OtherUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO SUNYTHE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCH: $17,253 · OtherTHE AQUINAS INSTITUTE OF ROCHHOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $15,558 · OtherHOLY CROSS SCHOOLMARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGE: $12,900 · OtherMARYLAND INSTITUTE COLLEGEST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $12,900 · OtherST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITYNAZARETH ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $10,300 · OtherST AMBROSE ACADEMY: $8,660 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,523 · Other+28 more: $54,197 · Other+28 moreUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $14,700 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF …SWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $3,400 · EducationSWARTHMORE COL…PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $3,400 · EducationPROVIDENCE COL…REGIS UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationREGIS UNIVERSI…Rochester Institute of Technology: $2,085 · EducationRochester Inst…BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $2,000 · EducationBERKLEE COLLEG…+7 more: $3,370 · Education+7 more
Other$211,639Education$31,955

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $14,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $12,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,085 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HALL: $1,213 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTYBURN ACADEMY OF MARY IMMACULATE INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARCHANGEL SCHOOL: $800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY: $695 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAEMEN UNIVERSITY: $475 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEUKA COLLEGE: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SWARTHMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HALL ↗
  • Who funds TYBURN ACADEMY OF MARY IMMACULATE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCHANGEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN FISHER UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John a Reddington Scholarship Fund Xxxx7366 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John a Reddington Scholarship Fund Xxxx7366. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 2% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John a Reddington Scholarship Fund Xxxx7366’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home