Skip to content

· Private foundation

Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$552k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.6MReligion$628kHuman Services$383kRecreation & Sports$317kPublic Benefit$256kHealth$254kEmployment$176kArts & Culture$173kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$300,000
GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA$85,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS$60,000
CHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$30,000
LIVINGSTON COUNTY EDUCATION & HOUSING COUNCIL$25,148
CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS$10,000
LIVINGSTON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONMAIN STREET$10,000
HOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$5,000
MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$5,000
LIVINGSTON COUNTY EXTENSION COUNCIL$2,500
GRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT$2,500
GOOD DADS INC$2,500
GRAND RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
CHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 15%GOOD DADS INC: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 25 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
15

Total granted

$3.8M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
0%

Still filing today

44%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +30% · 41% of their budget
  • GR
    GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $330k · revenue +89%
  • HH
    HOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $176k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOME OF SLICED BREAD CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $66k · revenue -60% · 35% of their budget
  • FC
    FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +12%
  • HO
    HOME OF SLICED BREAD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chillicothe Area Ymca Foundation

An endowment fund designed to assist and support grand river area family ymca, inc.

Philanthropy
2
Chillicothe Area Chamber of Commerce Association

Economic development in chillicothe, missouri.

—
3
Downtown Chillicothe

To promote historic preservation, protection and use of chillicothe's downtown area by disseminating information of and promoting interest in the preservation, history, culture, architecture and diverse public use of chillicothe's…

Human Services
4
Livingston County Historical Society

Preservation of county history and the county museum.

—
5
Nuckolls County Historical Society

County museum of historical artifacts

—
6
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
7
Rockford Area Historical Society

Inspire communitys interest in the past

Arts & Culture
8
Kutztown Area Historical Society

Collect and preserve area artifacts; maintain the 1892 historical building as a museum which includes the non-circulating historical library; preserve and record the history and culture of kutztown area

Arts & Culture
9
Lyon County Historical Society

Maintain historical artifacts

—
10
Richland County Historical Society

Educate public on area history.

—
11
Chippewa Area History Center Inc

The chippewa area history center works to preserve local history and make it available to the public.

Arts & Culture
12
Crook County Historical Society

Non-profit museum

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand River Area Family Ymca Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grand River Historial Society Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $330,462 · OtherGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INCHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION: $330,000 · OtherHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSIONCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $252,500 · OtherCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $230,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC: $175,819 · OtherHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INCFRIENDS OF CHILLICOTHE PARKS INC: $103,450 · OtherFRIENDS OF CHILLICOTHE PARKS INCIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · Other+25 more: $412,525 · Other+25 moreCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,544,624 · EducationCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION+1 more: $30,000 · EducationLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $255,000 · Public BenefitHEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthHOME OF SLICED BREAD CORPORATION: $65,500 · Arts & CultureGRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM: $19,500 · Arts & CultureKELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 · Human ServicesGOOD DADS INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$1,915,256Education$1,574,624Public Benefit$255,000Health$152,500Arts & Culture$95,000Housing & Shelter$80,000Human Services$57,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,544,624 over 9y, 41% of budgetGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $330,462 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION: $255,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC: $175,819 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetHEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 3y, 88% of budgetCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS: $80,000 over 7y, 71% of budgetHOME OF SLICED BREAD CORPORATION: $65,500 over 1y, 35% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetGRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM: $19,500 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetGRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT: $17,500 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $12,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetCHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetGOOD DADS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS ↗
  • Who funds HOME OF SLICED BREAD CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER HISTORIAL SOCIETY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GRAND RIVER ENTERTAINMENT ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD DADS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mervyn W Jenkins FoundationMO36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mervyn W Jenkins Foundation · Hal F Juckette Family Foundation · Livingston County Community Foundation · Roger a Browning Foundation Inc · Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation · Minnie B Hedrick Trust · Fm & Gladys McCall Foundation · James Allbritain Lawson Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Joe and Lenore Lambert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph