Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hal F Juckette Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$475kReligion$409kHuman Services$290kFood & Nutrition$140kRecreation & Sports$127kHousing & Shelter$102kAnimals$87kEmployment$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
$20,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$39,900
CHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE$27,500
HOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION$27,500
GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA$20,500
CHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
FRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNITY INC$3,100
CHILLICOTHE THEATRE CO$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OATS TRANSIT: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 24 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
9

Total granted

$1.7M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+70%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $272k · revenue +105%
  • CE
    CHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $225k · revenue +14%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    4× · 2019–2023 · $103k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +319%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHILLICOTHE PARKS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • KP
    KELLY POLING ARTS DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chillicothe Area Chamber of Commerce Association

Economic development in chillicothe, missouri.

2
Elderly Housing Corporation of Clay County Mn

To provide low income housing for those in need.

3
Clay County Animal Shelter Inc

Provide shelter for lost, stray & abandoned animals in clay county

Animals
4
Christian Village Inc

The provision of affordable housing and services to the elderly and infirm in need of skilled and intermediate nursing care and independent living

Health
5
Champaign County Humane Association

The champaign county humane association owns and operates the paws animal shelter. the mission is to provide food and shelter to abandoned and strayed animals.

Animals
6
Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

Human Services
7
Christian Community Care Clinic

To provide medical care to the uninsured.

Health
8
Chillicothe Country Club

Providing social and recreational activities for members

9
Community Memorial Health Center

Nursing home and assisted living care for the elderly.

Health
10
Hospice of Chenango County Inc

To provide end of life care and bereavement counseling to the terminally ill and their families in chenango county, new york.

11
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

12
Livingston County Community Development Corporation

The focus of main street chillicothe is to enhance the vitality of the downtown by preservation of its architectural, commercial, and cultural heritage. these objectives are accomplished through education and community awareness of…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concerned Citizens for the Communit and the most unlike its peers is Kelly Poling Arts District. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYmca Community CentersSenior Support ServicesYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 29. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%4%<5yr6%12%5–10yr14%24%10–20yr21%24%20–35yr16%20%35–55yr27%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%1%<5yr6%5%5–10yr14%8%10–20yr21%23%20–35yr16%42%35–55yr27%20%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
7%
9/134

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC — $272,000 · OtherGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INCCHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE — $176,185 · OtherCHILLICOTHE MINISTERIAL ALLIANCEHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSION — $171,617 · OtherHOUSE OF PRAYER RESCUE MISSIONCHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT — $147,515 · OtherCHILLICOTHE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICTCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $83,000 · OtherCHILLICOTHE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMINISTERIAL ALLIANCE — $61,500 · OtherHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC — $60,000 · OtherCHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $42,600 · Other+14 more — $189,712 · Other+14 moreCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $225,000 · EducationCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIO…COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $102,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARK…+1 more — $10,242 · EducationVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $50,000 · Public BenefitLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 · Public BenefitCENTRAL MISSOURI HONOR FLIGHT INC — $17,500 · Public BenefitLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $54,500 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER — $32,500 · AnimalsFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $71,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIVINGSTON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL AND HOUSING COUNCIL — $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT — $64,766 · Food & NutritionCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS — $30,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,204,129Education$337,742Public Benefit$92,500Animals$87,000Youth Development$79,000Food & Nutrition$64,766Housing & Shelter$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC — $272,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetCHILLICOTHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $225,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $102,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $71,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERNED CITIZENS FOR THE COMMUNIT — $64,766 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetHOPE HAVEN INDUSTRIES INC — $60,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $54,500 over 6y, 10% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHILLICOTHE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION — $42,600 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARKVILLE ANIMAL SHELTER — $32,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetCHILLICOTHE AREA CHRISTIAN BUILDERS — $30,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY VETERANS ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHEDRICK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $22,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetCENTRAL MISSOURI HONOR FLIGHT INC — $17,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH MISSOURI CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC — $10,242 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetGREENHILLS SOCCER CLUB — $10,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetOATS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULTURAL CORNER ART GUILD AND GALLERY — $7,500 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetLIVINGSTON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL AND HOUSING COUNCIL — $7,500 over 2y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $6,917 over 2y, 2.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mervyn W Jenkins FoundationMO36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mervyn W Jenkins Foundation · Joe and Lenore Lambert Foundation · Roger a Browning Foundation Inc · Livingston County Community Foundation · Minnie B Hedrick Trust · Carl C & Ardath Hudnall Foundation · James Allbritain Lawson Charitable Trust · Fm & Gladys McCall Foundation · Mfa Oil Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hal F Juckette Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hal F Juckette Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hal F Juckette Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph