Loading…
· Public charity
JOB CREATORS NETWORK INC
Bring together job creators from large and small companies to educate americans on the vital role of free enterprise and entrepreneurship in creating jobs, spurring innovation and ensuring america's future economic success.
$355k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
4
Communities
$235k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 73% of JOB CREATORS NETWORK INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
documentary filmfsfmediacorruptionresearchlatinotlc
2019
free-market healthhealth carecare policymediafsfinformissues
2020
politicscontentresourceinformationpolicy
2022
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
$65,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- KEEP AMERICA AMERICA ACTION FUND$235,000
- NHCLC$65,000
- SALIENT PUBLICATIONS$40,000
- CENTRO CRISTIANO$12,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 9%. 95% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Libertarian Institute
Provide information regarding libertarian principles.
Education
2
Lawfare Institute
Produce scientific content on lawfare and the analysis of emblematic cases of the phenomenon through publication of the lawfare website, podcasts and related media.
Public Benefit
3
Press Watch
To educate journalists and the public, and foster public debate, about improving political journalism to reflect public needs and hold the powerful accountable.
—
4
Libertas Institute
Libertas Institute is a public policy and education organization focused on free markets and individual rights. We generate non-partisan analysis and commentary, conduct investigative research, and publish educational literature to inform…
Public Benefit
5
Latino Political Network
—
6
Global Policy Forum Inc
Research and education of United Nations activities
International
7
Foundation for Investigative Journalism
Mission:To provide ideology-free media platforms representing balanced news and educational forums to inform and increase critical thinking and engagement.
Public Benefit
8
The Compact Institute of Ideas
The purpose of The Compact Institute of Ideas is to support exceptional journalism, as exemplified by COMPACT, and to conduct related public educational programs, such as training, mentorship, and sponsoring of journalists and public…
Arts & Culture
9
Institute of Politics Policy and History
Education
10
The American Lyceum
The American Lyceum is dedicated to facilitating and educating the public on constitutional values of American exceptionalism, liberty, and civil discourse through idea-centric debates, research, and scholarly writing.
Education
11
Contemporary Policy Institute
Philanthropy
12
London Center for Policy Research Inc
Engage in research on key national security and foreign policy issues.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Latino Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lucy Burns Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,218,889Education$250,000Religion$65,000Public Benefit$51,167Civil Rights$50,000Arts & Culture$40,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LATINO COALITION ↗
- Who funds DARK WIRE-THE INVESTIGATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FULL STORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NHCLC ↗
- Who funds GOODMAN INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds SALIENT PUBLICATIONS ↗
- Who funds LUCY BURNS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE TO UNLEASH PROSPERITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Job Creators Network FoundationTX16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Job Creators Network Foundation · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JOB CREATORS NETWORK INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SALIENT PUBLICATIONS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~15 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 871592912 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SALIENT PUBLICATIONS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 15 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Job Creators Network Inc?
Find your warmest path to Job Creators Network Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines