Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jm Lazarus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$117kHealth$86kAnimals$50kPhilanthropy$49kInternational$42kArts & Culture$26kEducation$23kFood & Nutrition$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
15
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC$10,000
IMPACT ISRAEL$7,500
ESPANOLA HUMANE$5,500
KEHILLAT ISRAEL$5,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$4,500
AMERICAN CORPORATION FOR ARTS$4,000
BEIT T'SHUVAH$4,000
TEMPLE BETH HILLEL$3,800
SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER$2,600
HEART & SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY$2,500
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$2,000
MAYO CLINIC$2,000
TEMPLE BETH SHALOM$2,000
CHABAD OF PACIFIC PALISADES$2,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $700 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $600 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $500 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $500 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $500 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $500 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $500 → 12%ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $300 → 12%MANY MOTHERS: $300 → 12%MANY MOTHERS: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$457k · 60 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
36

Total granted

$457k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthInternationalEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    IMPACTISRAEL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +35%
  • BT
    Beit T'Shuvah
    6× · 2018–2025 · $24k · revenue +49%
  • EV
    ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +127%

Funded once

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • JUDAISM YOUR WAY
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
2
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

—
7
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
10
Animal Protection New Mexico

To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…

Animals
11
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
12
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Roots Animal Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/63
Grantees still filing
52/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEHILLAT ISRAEL RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION OF PACIFIC PALISADES: $45,580 · OtherKEHILLAT ISRAEL RECONSTRUCTIONIST CONGREGATION OF PACIFIC PALISADESTEMPLE BETH HILLEL: $44,150 · OtherTEMPLE BETH HILLELTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $30,790 · OtherTEMPLE BETH SHALOMUNITED JEWISH FUND: $28,700 · OtherUNITED JEWISH FUNDBeit T'Shuvah: $23,700 · OtherBeit T'ShuvahIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMD ANDERSON CANCER SOCIETY: $21,200 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER SOCIETYJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELESMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $16,500 · OtherCENTER THEATER GROUP: $13,900 · Other+62 more: $82,509 · Other+62 moreESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,475 · AnimalsESPANOLA VAL…SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,395 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANI…THE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $12,550 · AnimalsTHE HEART AN…KINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,250 · Animals+11 more: $9,545 · Animals+11 moreIMPACTISRAEL INC: $41,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAE…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $3,200 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT …+2 more: $1,000 · InternationalCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthCoronado Hospital Foundation: $9,500 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 · Health+4 more: $2,200 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education+3 more: $1,000 · EducationHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $4,060 · Youth DevelopmentASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $4,100 · Human ServicesMany Mothers Inc: $1,100 · Human Services
Other$350,029Animals$56,215International$52,200Health$26,700Education$16,500Youth Development$14,060Human Services$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $23,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,475 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $15,395 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $12,550 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCoronado Hospital Foundation: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST: $4,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOOKING WITH KIDS INC: $4,060 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpikes K9 Fund: $3,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER: $1,645 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLonghopes Donkey Shelter Inc: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Equality: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMany Mothers Inc: $1,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetARGOS A SHELTER DOG RESCUE: $1,050 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARY C SCHANZ FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUDAISM YOUR WAY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara County Search and Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA WEST: $875 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew Mexico Cancer Research Alliance: $700 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARAMOUNT EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ACRE FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds ESPANOLA VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART AND SOUL ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Coronado Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF THE WEST ↗
  • Who funds COOKING WITH KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Spikes K9 Fund ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KINDRED SPIRITS ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM29.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · The Allene & Jerome Lapides Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · The Capitol Ford Charitable Foundation · The Melville Hankins Family Foundation Inc · Feinberg Foundation · Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation · The Gumbo Foundation · Livingry Foundation · Carroll Petrie Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jm Lazarus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jm Lazarus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jm Lazarus Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jm Lazarus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jm Lazarus’ filings →

More from the funding graph