Skip to content

· Private foundation

Jim and Deb Hovinga Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$473kHuman Services$226kHousing & Shelter$101kHealth$64kCivil Rights$62kEducation$46kAnimals$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKEGON RESCUE MISSION$50,000
GATEWAY MISSION$15,000
LOVE IN ACTION$15,000
MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES$15,000
GUIDING LIGHT$10,000
KIDS HOPE USA$10,000
CAMP GENEVA$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES$2,500
DEGAGE MINISTRIES$2,500
RESILIENCE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $7k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $3k → 11%THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $2k → 11%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%RESILIENCE: $2k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $4k → 8%DEGAGE MINISTRIES: $3k → 11%CENTER FOR WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%THE PEOPLE CENTER: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 20 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

$1.1M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+27%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $115k · revenue +141%
  • DM
    DEGAGE MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +74%
  • KH
    Kids Hope USA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $56k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • LI
    LOVE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • D
    DAYBREAK
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • DC
    DAYBREAK COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
2
Redemption Road Ministries

Redemption road provides housing, re-entry and transition services for men and women coming out of the criminal justice system. the mission is to provide to provide christ centered, bible based recovery from drug and alcohol abuse, damaged…

Religion
3
Christian Recovery Centers Inc

To provide guidance and rehabilitation in a christ centered residential setting for persons with addiction

Health
4
Beacon of Hope

Beacon of hope's mission is to be god's hand offering christ-centered, inclusive, accessible and professional mental health counseling.

Religion
5
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
6
Ministry Center

We build bridges between people experiencing the immediate effects of poverty and homelessness to the physical and spiritual resources available to alleviate suffering and facilitate long term transformation.

Human Services
7
His Hope Ministries Inc

Helping families fight homelessness and find living hope.

Housing & Shelter
8
Streetlife Ministries

Street life ministries organizes local churches, civic groups, private individuals and other interested parties to serve the local homeless and impoverished population by providing meals and ad hoc counseling to urge them toward resources…

Religion
9
Grace Haven Ministries

Grace haven ministries mission is to rescue, renew, restore and return women to family and community after being set free of addiction through the power of jesus christ.

Crime & Legal
10
Bridge of Hope Ministries

Transforming lives in the Ville through access to supportive services and efficacy.

Religion
11
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
12
Northlands Rescue Mission Inc

To provide a shelter and a place of hope where people can recover from homelessness, pain and addiction, restoring their dignity and improving their lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Degage Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Barnabas Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUSKEGON RESCUE MISSION: $350,000 · OtherMUSKEGON RESCUE MISSIONMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $115,000 · OtherMEL TROTTER MINISTRIESSALVATION ARMY: $115,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONS: $85,000 · OtherLAKESHORE RESCUE MISSIONSLOVE IN ACTION: $75,000 · OtherLOVE IN ACTIONGUIDING LIGHT MINISTRIES: $55,000 · OtherGUIDING LIGHT MINISTRIESOAR - OTTAGAN ADDICTIONS RECOVERY: $37,000 · Other+10 more: $54,050 · Other+10 moreDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $57,500 · Human ServicesDEGAGE MINISTR…THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $49,000 · Human ServicesTHE OTHER WAY …RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $18,000 · Human ServicesRESILIENCE ADV…WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12,500 · Human ServicesWEDGWOOD CHRIS…THE PEOPLE CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesKids Hope USA: $56,000 · EducationGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $37,000 · ReligionBARNABAS MINISTRIES: $9,000 · ReligionREACH FOR RECOVERY INC: $15,000 · HealthHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $7,000 · HealthHOMECOR: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$886,050Human Services$143,000Education$56,000Religion$46,000Health$22,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEL TROTTER MINISTRIES: $115,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDEGAGE MINISTRIES: $57,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetKids Hope USA: $56,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES: $49,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER: $37,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE: $18,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetREACH FOR RECOVERY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBARNABAS MINISTRIES: $9,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CENTER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHOMECOR: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DEGAGE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Kids Hope USA ↗
  • Who funds THE OTHER WAY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEDGWOOD CHRISTIAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING LIGHT MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMECOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grand Haven Area Community Foundation IncMI26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Barnabas Foundation · Marvin G & Jerene L Dewitt Family Foundation · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Folkert Family Foundation · Cdv5 Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jim and Deb Hovinga Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jim and Deb Hovinga Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jim and Deb Hovinga’s filings →

    More from the funding graph