Loading…
· Private foundation
JIALE & WINNIE SU FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$32k
Granted FY2025
7
Grants
3
Communities
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of JIALE & WINNIE SU FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
getresearchtreatment
2021
treatment
2022
treatmentenvironment
2023
treatment
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$23k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MEALS ON WHEELS INC OF TARRANT COUNTY$6,524
- PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS$6,000
- ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER$6,000
- WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$6,000
- HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS$3,000
- DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
- THE SALVATION ARMY TEXAS$1,200
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 41% of JIALE & WINNIE SU FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 63% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
JIALE & WINNIE SU FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$187k · 11 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
10
Total granted
$187k
$6k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+52%
-12%
Still filing today
64%
30%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsInternationalHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +40%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +1417%- UGUNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY7× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- CCCLOUD COVERED STREETSone grant, 2023 · $2k
- GPGRAND PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2022 · $1k
- UNUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
2
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
3
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital
A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.
Health
4
The University of Texas Law School
Provide support to the University of Texas School of Law.
Education
5
University of Dallas
The university of dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education. the university seeks to educate its students so they may develop the intellectual and moral virtues,…
Education
6
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc
To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.
Health
7
Whitworth University
Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars. recognized as one of the top regional colleges and…
Education
8
Christus Northeast Texas Health System
Coordinating parent of charitable healthcare system guiding activities of affiliated entities to provide quality healthcare services to the community.
Religion
9
Ronald Mcdonald House of Dallas
The ronald mcdonald house of dallas endowment foundation (ef) supports and benefits the ronald mcdonald house of dallas, inc. (rmhd) by investing and managing gifts, grants, contributions and bequests intended to benefit the long term…
Human Services
10
Southwestern Health Resources
To further the missions of UTSW and THR on a local, regional and national level through the creation of a clinically integrated network of physicians, hospitals and other care providers to deliver healthcare across the continuum and by…
Health
11
Texas Health Physicians Group
A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF the people in the communities it serves, regarless of thier ability to pay.
Health
12
Baylor Medical Center at Irving
Faith based acute care hospital providing exemplary patient care, medical education, medical research and community service to Irving, Texas and the surrounding communities since 1964.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Wounded Warrior Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
06the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$111,798Housing & Shelter$37,200Animals$23,600International$10,000Health$8,220Education$2,500Human Services$25
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HUNTINGTON-SURREY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON ↗
- Who funds DARE AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation JIALE & WINNIE SU FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 751234898 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Jiale & Winnie Su Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Jiale & Winnie Su Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines